Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Comparison of the effects of a monounsaturated fat diet and a high carbohydrate diet on cardiovascular risk factors in first degree relatives to type-2 diabetic subjects.

European journal of clinical nutrition
October 1, 1999
C Thomsen et al. (8 authors)
Comparative StudyJournal ArticleHuman Study
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to compare the effects of a high-carbohydrate diet versus a monounsaturated fatty acid (MUFA)-rich diet on cardiovascular risk factors in individuals at high risk of developing Type-2 diabetes.

Results Summary

The study found that both diets had similar effects on total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, triglycerides, and apoB levels. The MUFA diet showed slightly higher HDL-cholesterol and apoA-1 levels, but insulin sensitivity, blood pressure, and vWF levels were similar between the diets.

Population

Sixteen healthy first-degree relatives of Type-2 diabetes patients (6 men, 10 women, mean age 35±2 years) with normal glucose tolerance.

Effective Dosage

55% of energy from carbohydrates, 30% from fat, 15% from protein (CHO diet).

Duration

Two 4-week treatment periods separated by a 4-week wash-out.

Interactions

None mentioned

Extracted Claims (18)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
diet rich in olive oil (MUFA diet)
increase
high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol
first-degree relatives of Type-2 DM patients
1.4+/-0.4 vs 1.3+/-0.4 mmol/l
slightly higher levels
#1
diet rich in olive oil (MUFA diet)
increase
apoA-1
first-degree relatives of Type-2 DM patients
1.2+/-0.3 vs 1.1+/-0.3 mmol/l
slightly higher levels
#2
diet rich in olive oil (MUFA diet)
decrease
total cholesterol
first-degree relatives of Type-2 DM patients
-
similar lowering effects
#3
diet rich in olive oil (MUFA diet)
decrease
low density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol
first-degree relatives of Type-2 DM patients
-
similar lowering effects
#4
diet rich in olive oil (MUFA diet)
decrease
triglyceride
first-degree relatives of Type-2 DM patients
-
similar lowering effects
#5
diet rich in olive oil (MUFA diet)
decrease
apoB levels
first-degree relatives of Type-2 DM patients
-
similar lowering effects
#6
diet rich in olive oil (MUFA diet)
no change
insulin sensitivity
first-degree relatives of Type-2 DM patients
-
similar
#7
diet rich in olive oil (MUFA diet)
no change
first response insulin areas
first-degree relatives of Type-2 DM patients
-
similar
#8
diet rich in olive oil (MUFA diet)
no change
24-h blood pressures
first-degree relatives of Type-2 DM patients
-
similar
#9
diet rich in olive oil (MUFA diet)
no change
von Willebrand Factor (vWF) levels
first-degree relatives of Type-2 DM patients
-
similar
#10
carbohydrate-rich (CHO) diet
decrease
total cholesterol
first-degree relatives of Type-2 DM patients
-
similar lowering effects
#11
carbohydrate-rich (CHO) diet
decrease
low density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol
first-degree relatives of Type-2 DM patients
-
similar lowering effects
#12
carbohydrate-rich (CHO) diet
decrease
triglyceride
first-degree relatives of Type-2 DM patients
-
similar lowering effects
#13
carbohydrate-rich (CHO) diet
decrease
apoB levels
first-degree relatives of Type-2 DM patients
-
similar lowering effects
#14
carbohydrate-rich (CHO) diet
no change
insulin sensitivity
first-degree relatives of Type-2 DM patients
-
similar
#15
carbohydrate-rich (CHO) diet
no change
first response insulin areas
first-degree relatives of Type-2 DM patients
-
similar
#16
carbohydrate-rich (CHO) diet
no change
24-h blood pressures
first-degree relatives of Type-2 DM patients
-
similar
#17
carbohydrate-rich (CHO) diet
no change
von Willebrand Factor (vWF) levels
first-degree relatives of Type-2 DM patients
-
similar
#18
Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Recent studies have demonstrated beneficial metabolic effects of dietary monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFA) in Type-2 diabetes mellitus (Type-2 DM). The question arises if dietary MUFA also has desirable effects on risk markers in subjects with high risk of developing Type-2 DM. SETTING: University department of endocrinology. SUBJECTS: Sixteen healthy, first-degree relatives (six men, 10 women, age (mean+/-s.d.): 35+/-2 years) with normal oral glucose tolerance tests. INTERVENTIONS: Randomised study with two 4-week treatment periods with either a carbohydrate-rich (CHO) diet (55 E% carbohydrate, 30 E% fat, 15 E% protein) or a diet rich in olive oil [MUFA 40 E% fat (25 E% as MUFA), 45 E% carbohydrate, 15 E% protein]. The periods were divided by a 4-week wash-out period. RESULTS: Similar lowering effects on total cholesterol, low density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol, triglyceride and apoB levels were seen after the two diets. Slightly higher levels of high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol (1.4+/-0.4 vs 1.3+/-0.4 mmol/l, P<0. 0001) and apoA-1 (1.2+/-0.3 vs 1.1+/-0.3 mmol/l, P<0.05) were found in the MUFA-diet. Furthermore, the insulin sensitivity, as assessed by Bergman's minimal model, and the first response insulin areas were similar, as were the 24-h blood pressures and the von Willebrand Factor (vWF) levels. CONCLUSIONS: Isocaloric diets rich in MUFA or rich in carbohydrate, respectively, seem to have similar effects on cardiovascular risk factors in persons at high risk of developing Type-2 DM. A potential risk, however, on body weight of high-fat diets should be kept in mind. SPONSORSHIP: This study was supported by grants from the Danish Diabetes Association, Institute of Clinical Experimental Research, Aarhus University, The Danish Heart Foundation, The Danish Medical Research Council, Velux Foundation, Poul and Erna Sehested Hansens Foundation, Mogens Svarre Mogensens Foundation.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
AdultApolipoprotein A-IApolipoproteins BBlood GlucoseCardiovascular DiseasesCholesterolCholesterol, HDLCholesterol, LDLDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Dietary CarbohydratesDietary Fats, UnsaturatedFemaleHumansInsulinMaleRisk FactorsTriglyceridesvon Willebrand Factor
Study Links
Quality Scores
Safety85
Efficacy75/10
Quality80/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations25
Citations/Year1.0
Relative Citation Ratio0.69
NIH Percentile36.9%
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.50
Weight Score0.61
Normalized Score0.80
Related Supplements