Effects of a vegetarian diet and treatment preference on biochemical and dietary variables in overweight and obese adults: a randomized clinical trial.
Study Goal
The researchers aimed to compare the effects of a calorie-restricted, low-fat lactoovovegetarian diet (LOV-D) versus a standard calorie-restricted, low-fat omnivorous diet (STD-D) on weight, cholesterol, and other metabolic outcomes over 18 months, while also examining the role of personal dietary preference.
Results Summary
The study found no significant interaction between dietary preference and treatment for any outcome. The LOV-D group showed a borderline significant decrease in LDL:HDL cholesterol, and participants in the Preference-No groups had significant reductions in triacylglycerols. Overall, all participants reduced total energy and fat intake, leading to weight loss.
Population
Overweight and obese adults (86.9% women, 70.5% white).
Effective Dosage
Not specified (calorie-restricted, low-fat diets).
Duration
12-month intervention followed by a 6-month maintenance phase (total 18 months).
Interactions
None mentioned
| Intervention | Direction | Endpoint | Population | Dosage | Impact | Claim # |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
calorie-restricted, low-fat lactoovovegetarian diet (LOV-D) | decrease | LDL:HDL cholesterol | overweight and obese adults | - | borderline significant decrease | #1 |
calorie-restricted, low-fat lactoovovegetarian diet (LOV-D) | decrease | monounsaturated fat intakes | 100% adherent participants within the LOV-D groups | - | significant reductions | #2 |
calorie-restricted, low-fat lactoovovegetarian diet (LOV-D) | decrease | total fat intakes | 100% adherent participants within the LOV-D groups | - | marginally significant reductions | #3 |
prescribing a vegetarian diet | no change | outcome measures | overweight and obese adults | - | had no significant effect | #4 |
allowing persons to choose their preferred diet | no change | outcome measures | overweight and obese adults | - | had no significant effect | #5 |
- | decrease | total energy intakes | all participants | - | significant reduction | #6 |
- | decrease | fat intakes | all participants | - | significant reduction | #7 |
- | increase | energy expenditure | all participants | - | increase | #8 |
- | decrease | body weight | all participants | - | reduced | #9 |
- | decrease | triacylglycerols | participants in the Preference-No groups | - | significantly decreased | #10 |
BACKGROUND: A vegetarian diet may lead to numerous health benefits, including weight loss. OBJECTIVE: We examined the joint effects of personal preference of dietary treatment and a calorie-restricted, low-fat lactoovovegetarian diet (LOV-D) compared with a standard calorie-restricted, low-fat omnivorous diet (STD-D) on changes in weight, total cholesterol, ratio of LDL to HDL cholesterol (LDL:HDL cholesterol), triacylglycerols, insulin resistance, and macronutrient intake during an 18-mo study. DESIGN: This was a randomized clinical trial of 176 overweight and obese adults who were recruited and randomly assigned first to 1 of 2 preference conditions (yes or no). If assigned to Preference-No, they were randomly assigned to 1 of the 2 diet conditions (STD-D or LOV-D). If assigned to Preference-Yes, they were assigned to the diet they indicated as preferred at screening. The 12-mo intervention was followed by a 6-mo maintenance phase. RESULTS: Participants were mainly women (86.9%) and white (70.5%); 75% completed the 18-mo study. A significant interaction between preference and dietary treatment was not observed for any of the outcome variables. However, participants in the Preference-No groups significantly decreased their triacylglycerols (P = 0.04). The only effect observed for diet was a borderline significant decrease in LDL:HDL cholesterol for the LOV-D group (P = 0.06). Within the LOV-D groups, those who were 100% adherent to the LOV-D had significant and marginally significant reductions in monounsaturated fat (P = 0.02) and total fat (P = 0.05) intakes at 18 mo. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that neither prescribing a vegetarian diet nor allowing persons to choose their preferred diet had a significant effect on outcome measures. However, all participants had a significant reduction in total energy and fat intakes and an increase in energy expenditure, which was reflected in reduced body weight. This clinical trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00330629.