Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

The effects of mindfulness-based stress reduction on psychosocial outcomes and quality of life in early-stage breast cancer patients: a randomized trial.

Breast cancer research and treatment
January 1, 2012
Virginia P Henderson et al. (6 authors)
Journal ArticleRandomized Controlled TrialResearch Support, N.I.H., ExtramuralResearch Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.Human StudyClinical
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to determine the effectiveness of an 8-week mindfulness-based stress-reduction (MBSR) program on quality of life and psychosocial outcomes in women with early-stage breast cancer.

Results Summary

The MBSR group showed significant improvements in quality of life, coping outcomes, and secondary psychosocial measures (e.g., depression, anxiety) compared to control groups at 4 months, though effects declined at 12 and 24 months. Benefits were consistent regardless of participants' initial expectations.

Population

Women aged 20-65 with stage I or II breast cancer.

Effective Dosage

8-week MBSR program (specific frequency not detailed).

Duration

8 weeks.

Interactions

None mentioned.

Extracted Claims (14)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
mindfulness-based stress-reduction (MBSR) program
increase
primary measures of QOL and coping outcomes
women with early-stage breast cancer
-
experienced a significant improvement
#1
mindfulness-based stress-reduction (MBSR) program
increase
spirituality subscale of the FACT-B
women with early-stage breast cancer
-
increases
#2
mindfulness-based stress-reduction (MBSR) program
increase
dealing with illness scale
women with early-stage breast cancer
-
increases
#3
mindfulness-based stress-reduction (MBSR) program
increase
active behavioral coping
women with early-stage breast cancer
-
increases
#4
mindfulness-based stress-reduction (MBSR) program
increase
active cognitive coping
women with early-stage breast cancer
-
increases
#5
mindfulness-based stress-reduction (MBSR) program
increase
meaningfulness
women with early-stage breast cancer
-
improvements resulting in significant between-group contrasts favoring the MBSR group at 4 months
#6
mindfulness-based stress-reduction (MBSR) program
decrease
depression
women with early-stage breast cancer
-
improvements resulting in significant between-group contrasts favoring the MBSR group at 4 months
#7
mindfulness-based stress-reduction (MBSR) program
decrease
paranoid ideation
women with early-stage breast cancer
-
improvements resulting in significant between-group contrasts favoring the MBSR group at 4 months
#8
mindfulness-based stress-reduction (MBSR) program
decrease
hostility
women with early-stage breast cancer
-
improvements resulting in significant between-group contrasts favoring the MBSR group at 4 months
#9
mindfulness-based stress-reduction (MBSR) program
decrease
anxiety
women with early-stage breast cancer
-
improvements resulting in significant between-group contrasts favoring the MBSR group at 4 months
#10
mindfulness-based stress-reduction (MBSR) program
decrease
unhappiness
women with early-stage breast cancer
-
improvements resulting in significant between-group contrasts favoring the MBSR group at 4 months
#11
mindfulness-based stress-reduction (MBSR) program
increase
emotional control
women with early-stage breast cancer
-
improvements resulting in significant between-group contrasts favoring the MBSR group at 4 months
#12
mindfulness-based stress-reduction (MBSR) program
decrease
psychosocial outcomes
women with early-stage breast cancer
-
Results tended to decline at 12 months and even more at 24 months
#13
mindfulness-based stress-reduction (MBSR) program
increase
psychosocial adjustment
cancer patients
-
appears to benefit
#14
Abstract

The aim of this study was determine the effectiveness of a mindfulness-based stress-reduction (MBSR) program on quality of life (QOL) and psychosocial outcomes in women with early-stage breast cancer, using a three-arm randomized controlled clinical trial (RCT). This RCT consisting of 172 women, aged 20-65 with stage I or II breast cancer consisted of the 8-week MBSR, which was compared to a nutrition education program (NEP) and usual supportive care (UC). Follow-up was performed at three post-intervention points: 4 months, 1, and 2 years. Standardized, validated self-administered questionnaires were adopted to assess psychosocial variables. Statistical analysis included descriptive and regression analyses incorporating both intention-to-treat and post hoc multivariable approaches of the 163 women with complete data at baseline, those who were randomized to MBSR experienced a significant improvement in the primary measures of QOL and coping outcomes compared to the NEP, UC, or both, including the spirituality subscale of the FACT-B as well as dealing with illness scale increases in active behavioral coping and active cognitive coping. Secondary outcome improvements resulting in significant between-group contrasts favoring the MBSR group at 4 months included meaningfulness, depression, paranoid ideation, hostility, anxiety, unhappiness, and emotional control. Results tended to decline at 12 months and even more at 24 months, though at all times, they were as robust in women with lower expectation of effect as in those with higher expectation. The MBSR intervention appears to benefit psychosocial adjustment in cancer patients, over and above the effects of usual care or a credible control condition. The universality of effects across levels of expectation indicates a potential to utilize this stress reduction approach as complementary therapy in oncologic practice.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
Adaptation, PsychologicalAdultAgedBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMeditationMiddle AgedMind-Body Relations, MetaphysicalQuality of LifeRelaxation TherapySelf CareSocial SupportStress, PsychologicalSurveys and QuestionnairesTreatment OutcomeYoung Adult
Study Links
Quality Scores
SafetyNot Assessed
Efficacy85/10
Quality90/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations138
Citations/Year10.6
Relative Citation Ratio5.14
NIH Percentile93.4%
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.95
Weight Score1.76
Normalized Score0.72
Related Supplements