A comparison of the effects of deep tissue massage and therapeutic massage on chronic low back pain.
Study Goal
The researchers aimed to compare the effectiveness of therapeutic massage (TM) and deep tissue massage (DTM) in treating chronic low back pain in elderly patients.
Results Summary
Both TM and DTM showed statistically significant improvements in pain and disability measures (ODI, QBPD, VAS). DTM was significantly more effective than TM in reducing disability (ODI) and pain (VAS).
Population
26 patients aged 60-75 years with chronic low back pain.
Effective Dosage
30-minute sessions daily for 10 days.
Duration
10 days
Interactions
None mentioned
| Intervention | Direction | Endpoint | Population | Dosage | Impact | Claim # |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
therapeutic massage | decrease | Modified Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Index | 26 patient aged from 60 to 75 years with chronic low back pain | p=0.010 | Statistically significant differences were noted | #1 |
therapeutic massage | decrease | Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale | 26 patient aged from 60 to 75 years with chronic low back pain | p<0.001 | Statistically significant differences were noted | #2 |
therapeutic massage | decrease | Visual Analog Scale | 26 patient aged from 60 to 75 years with chronic low back pain | p<0.001 | Statistically significant differences were noted | #3 |
deep tissue massage | decrease | Modified Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Index | 26 patient aged from 60 to 75 years with chronic low back pain | p<0.001 | Statistically significant differences were noted | #4 |
deep tissue massage | decrease | Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale | 26 patient aged from 60 to 75 years with chronic low back pain | p<0.001 | Statistically significant differences were noted | #5 |
deep tissue massage | decrease | Visual Analog Scale | 26 patient aged from 60 to 75 years with chronic low back pain | p<0.001 | Statistically significant differences were noted | #6 |
deep tissue massage | decrease | Modified Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Index | 26 patient aged from 60 to 75 years with chronic low back pain | p=0.038 | was statistically significant better therapy than therapeutic massage | #7 |
deep tissue massage | decrease | Visual Analog Scale | 26 patient aged from 60 to 75 years with chronic low back pain | p=0.015 | was statistically significant better therapy than therapeutic massage | #8 |
INTRODUCTION: This study compared the effectiveness of two different kind of massage: therapeutic and deep tissue on chronic low back pain. METHODS: The research was made on 26 patient aged from 60 to 75 years who were separated into 2 groups: I [n=13] and II [n=13]. Group I had therapeutic massage [TM] which uses effleurage, petrissage, tapping and friction. Group II had deep tissue massage [DTM] which uses oblique pressure, a combination of lengthening and cross-fiber strokes, anchor and stretch, freeing muscle from entrapment. TM and DTM lasted for 10 days, each 30 min and were made by qualify massage therapist. Both groups did not have other treatment. Outcome measures obtained at baseline and after treatment consisted of Modified Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Index [ODI], Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale[QBPD] and Visual Analog Scale [VAS]. RESULTS: There was not statistically significant differences between groups according to age and BMI. Statistically significant differences were noted after TM in every test [ODI p=0.010; QBPD p<0.001; VAS p<0.001] and after DTM in every test [ODI p<0.001; QBPD p<0.001; VAS p<0.001]. DTM was statistically significant better therapy than TM in ODI [p=0.038] and VAS [p=0.015]. Further research is needed to verify the results.