Effectiveness of soft tissue massage and exercise for the treatment of non-specific shoulder pain: a systematic review with meta-analysis.
Study Goal
To determine the effectiveness of soft tissue massage, either alone or combined with exercise, for treating non-specific shoulder problems.
Results Summary
Low-quality evidence suggests soft tissue massage moderately improves active flexion, abduction range of motion, pain, and functional scores compared to no treatment, but only immediately post-treatment. Exercise showed small pain improvements but no significant functional or range-of-motion benefits.
Population
Adults aged 18-80 with non-surgical painful shoulder disorders.
Effective Dosage
Not specified
Duration
Not specified
Interactions
None mentioned
| Intervention | Direction | Endpoint | Population | Dosage | Impact | Claim # |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
soft tissue massage | increase | active flexion and abduction range of motion, pain and functional scores | participants with non-specific shoulder problems | moderate improvements | was effective for producing moderate improvements | #1 |
exercise | increase | reported pain | participants with non-specific shoulder problems | weighted mean=9.8 of 100, 95% CI 0.6 to 19.0 | produce greater improvements | #2 |
exercise | no change | shoulder function | participants with non-specific shoulder problems | weighted mean=5.7 of 100, 95% CI -3.3 to 14.7 | did not produce greater improvements | #3 |
soft tissue massage | increase | pain, function and range of motion | patients with shoulder pain | - | is effective for improving | #4 |
exercise therapy | increase | pain | patients with shoulder pain | small improvements | is effective for producing small improvements | #5 |
exercise therapy | no change | function or range of motion | patients with shoulder pain | - | not in function or range of motion | #6 |
OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of exercise and soft tissue massage either in isolation or in combination for the treatment of non-specific shoulder problems. METHODS: Database searches for articles from 1966 to December 2011 were performed. Studies were eligible if they investigated 'hands on' soft tissue massage performed locally to the shoulder or exercises aimed at improving strength, range of motion or coordination; non-surgical painful shoulder disorders; included participants aged 18-80 years and outcomes measured included pain, disability, range of motion, quality of life, work status, global perceived effect, adverse events or recurrence. RESULTS: Twenty-three papers met the selection criteria representing 20 individual trials. We found low-quality evidence that soft tissue massage was effective for producing moderate improvements in active flexion and abduction range of motion, pain and functional scores compared with no treatment, immediately after the cessation of treatment. Exercise was shown by meta-analysis to produce greater improvements than placebo, minimal or no treatment in reported pain (weighted mean=9.8 of 100, 95% CI 0.6 to 19.0) but these changes were of a magnitude that was less than that considered clinically worthwhile. Exercise did not produce greater improvements in shoulder function than placebo, minimal or no treatment (weighted mean=5.7 of 100, 95% CI -3.3 to 14.7). CONCLUSION: There is low-quality evidence that soft tissue massage is effective for improving pain, function and range of motion in patients with shoulder pain in the short term. Exercise therapy is effective for producing small improvements in pain but not in function or range of motion.