Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Short-term effects of interferential current electro-massage in adults with chronic non-specific low back pain: a randomized controlled trial.

Clinical rehabilitation
May 1, 2013
Inmaculada Carmen Lara-Palomo et al. (7 authors)
Journal ArticleRandomized Controlled TrialHuman StudyClinical
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to determine whether a combined procedure of massage and electrotherapy with interferential current was more effective than superficial massage in improving disability, pain, and quality of life in individuals with chronic non-specific low back pain.

Results Summary

The study found that interferential current electro-massage significantly improved disability, pain, and quality of life compared to superficial massage, with statistically significant improvements in visual analogue scale, Oswestry Disability Index, Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire, and quality of life scores.

Population

Sixty-two individuals with chronic non-specific low back pain of mechanical aetiology.

Effective Dosage

20 sessions (twice a week) of massage with interferential current.

Duration

10 weeks.

Interactions

None mentioned

Extracted Claims (9)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
interferential current electro-massage
decrease
disability
individuals with chronic non-specific low back pain
-
achieved a significantly greater improvement
#1
interferential current electro-massage
decrease
pain
individuals with chronic non-specific low back pain
-
achieved a significantly greater improvement
#2
interferential current electro-massage
increase
quality of life
individuals with chronic non-specific low back pain
-
achieved a significantly greater improvement
#3
interferential current electro-massage
decrease
visual analogue scale
individuals with chronic non-specific low back pain
-
showed statistically significant group * time interactions
#4
interferential current electro-massage
decrease
Oswestry Disability Index
individuals with chronic non-specific low back pain
-
showed statistically significant group * time interactions
#5
interferential current electro-massage
decrease
Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire
individuals with chronic non-specific low back pain
-
showed statistically significant group * time interactions
#6
interferential current electro-massage
increase
quality of life (physical function)
individuals with chronic non-specific low back pain
-
showed statistically significant group * time interactions
#7
interferential current electro-massage
increase
quality of life (physical role)
individuals with chronic non-specific low back pain
-
showed statistically significant group * time interactions
#8
interferential current electro-massage
increase
quality of life (body pain)
individuals with chronic non-specific low back pain
-
showed statistically significant group * time interactions
#9
Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To analyse the effectiveness of a combined procedure of massage and electrotherapy with interferential current in individuals with chronic non-specific low back pain of mechanical aetiology. DESIGN: A single blinded randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Clinical setting. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty-two individuals with chronic non-specific low back pain were randomly assigned to an experimental or control group. For 10 weeks the experimental group underwent treatment comprising 20 sessions (twice a week) of massage with interferential current in the lumbar and dorsal-lumbar area, and the control group received superficial lower back massage (effleurage, superficial pressure and skin rolling). MAIN OUTCOME VARIABLES: Oswestry Disability Index, pain visual analogue scale, Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia, Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire, McQuade Test, Side Bridge Test, quality of life scores and the range of trunk anteflexion motion, which were all assessed before the treatment and immediately after the last treatment session. RESULTS: The 2 × 2 mixed model ANOVA with repeated measurements showed statistically significant group * time interactions for the visual analogue scale (F = 12.839; P = 0.001), Oswestry Disability Index (F = 5.850; P = 0.019), Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (F = 8.237; P = 0.006) and quality of life (physical function (F = 16.792; P = 0.001), physical role (F = 14.839; P = 0.001) and body pain (F = 11.247; P = 0.001)). CONCLUSIONS: In individuals with chronic non-specific low back pain, interferential current electro-massage achieved a significantly greater improvement in disability, pain and quality of life in comparison to superficial massage after 20 treatment sessions.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
Activities of Daily LivingAnalysis of VarianceChronic PainElectric Stimulation TherapyFemaleHumansLow Back PainMaleMassageMiddle AgedPain MeasurementQuality of LifeSelf ReportSpainTreatment Outcome
Study Links
Quality Scores
SafetyNot Assessed
Efficacy85/10
Quality80/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations42
Citations/Year3.5
Relative Citation Ratio2.26
NIH Percentile78.1%
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.75
Weight Score1.61
Normalized Score0.70
Related Supplements
Short-term effects of interferential current electro-massage... | Panacea Index