Effectiveness of home-based cupping massage compared to progressive muscle relaxation in patients with chronic neck pain--a randomized controlled trial.
Study Goal
The researchers aimed to compare the efficacy of partner-delivered home-based cupping massage versus progressive muscle relaxation in reducing chronic non-specific neck pain.
Results Summary
Both cupping massage and progressive muscle relaxation significantly reduced neck pain compared to baseline, with no significant differences between the two treatments. Cupping massage showed additional benefits in improving well-being and decreasing pressure pain sensitivity.
Population
Patients with chronic non-specific neck pain (mean age 54.1±12.7 years; 73.8% female).
Effective Dosage
Twice weekly for 12 weeks.
Duration
12 weeks.
Interactions
None mentioned.
| Intervention | Direction | Endpoint | Population | Dosage | Impact | Claim # |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
partner-delivered home-based cupping massage | decrease | current neck pain intensity | patients with chronic non-specific neck pain | - | showed significantly less pain | #1 |
progressive muscle relaxation | decrease | current neck pain intensity | patients with chronic non-specific neck pain | - | showed significantly less pain | #2 |
cupping massage | no change | chronic non-specific neck pain | patients with chronic non-specific neck pain | - | no more effective than progressive muscle relaxation | #3 |
cupping massage | increase | wellbeing | patients with chronic non-specific neck pain | - | significant effects in favor | #4 |
cupping massage | increase | pressure pain thresholds | patients with chronic non-specific neck pain | - | significant effects in favor | #5 |
cupping massage | increase | well-being | patients with chronic non-specific neck pain | - | better than PMR in improving | #6 |
cupping massage | decrease | pressure pain sensitivity | patients with chronic non-specific neck pain | - | better than PMR in decreasing | #7 |
both therapies | decrease | pain | patients with chronic non-specific neck pain | to a minimal clinically relevant extent | can reduce pain | #8 |
UNLABELLED: Chronic neck pain is a major public health problem with very few evidence-based complementary treatment options. This study aimed to test the efficacy of 12 weeks of a partner-delivered home-based cupping massage, compared to the same period of progressive muscle relaxation in patients with chronic non-specific neck pain. Patients were randomly assigned to self-directed cupping massage or progressive muscle relaxation. They were trained and asked to undertake the assigned treatment twice weekly for 12 weeks. Primary outcome measure was the current neck pain intensity (0-100 mm visual analog scale; VAS) after 12 weeks. Secondary outcome measures included pain on motion, affective pain perception, functional disability, psychological distress, wellbeing, health-related quality of life, pressure pain thresholds and adverse events. Sixty one patients (54.1±12.7 years; 73.8%female) were randomized to cupping massage (n = 30) or progressive muscle relaxation (n = 31). After treatment, both groups showed significantly less pain compared to baseline however without significant group differences. Significant effects in favor of cupping massage were only found for wellbeing and pressure pain thresholds. In conclusion, cupping massage is no more effective than progressive muscle relaxation in reducing chronic non-specific neck pain. Both therapies can be easily used at home and can reduce pain to a minimal clinically relevant extent. Cupping massage may however be better than PMR in improving well-being and decreasing pressure pain sensitivity but more studies with larger samples and longer follow-up periods are needed to confirm these results. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01500330.