Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Nutrient displacement associated with walnut supplementation in men.

Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association
April 1, 2014
S Kranz et al. (6 authors)
Journal ArticleRandomized Controlled TrialResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tHuman StudyClinical
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to evaluate how incorporating walnuts (75 g/day) into the diet affected energy and nutrient intake in men at risk for prostate cancer.

Results Summary

Energy intake increased on the walnut-supplemented diet, but body weight was maintained. Walnuts partially replaced other foods, improving the diet's nutrient profile, though the full benefit of walnuts was not optimized due to incomplete dietary adjustments.

Population

Men aged 45-75 years with a mean BMI of 27.6 kg/m² at risk for prostate cancer (n=19).

Effective Dosage

75 g/day of walnuts.

Duration

Two 8-week diet periods (usual vs. walnut-supplemented).

Interactions

None mentioned.

Extracted Claims (10)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
walnuts (75 g day(-1))
neutral
energy and nutrient intake
men (45-75 years; mean body mass index = 27.6 kg m(-2); n = 19) at risk for developing prostate cancer
-
affected
#1
walnut supplement diet
increase
energy intake
men (45-75 years; mean body mass index = 27.6 kg m(-2); n = 19) at risk for developing prostate cancer
-
exceeded
#2
walnut supplement diet
no change
body weight
men (45-75 years; mean body mass index = 27.6 kg m(-2); n = 19) at risk for developing prostate cancer
-
was maintained
#3
actual walnut supplement diet
decrease
energy intake
men (45-75 years; mean body mass index = 27.6 kg m(-2); n = 19) at risk for developing prostate cancer
10,865 kJ (2595 kcal) versus 11,325 kJ (2705 kcal) per day
was lower
#4
actual walnut supplement diet
decrease
energy
men (45-75 years; mean body mass index = 27.6 kg m(-2); n = 19) at risk for developing prostate cancer
23% less
contributed
#5
walnuts
no change
total fat and saturated fatty acids
men (45-75 years; mean body mass index = 27.6 kg m(-2); n = 19) at risk for developing prostate cancer
86% and 85%
were not displaced
#6
walnut supplement diet
increase
fibre
men (45-75 years; mean body mass index = 27.6 kg m(-2); n = 19) at risk for developing prostate cancer
less than one-half (39%) of the fibre provided by 75 g of walnuts
increase
#7
walnuts
decrease
other foods
men (45-75 years; mean body mass index = 27.6 kg m(-2); n = 19) at risk for developing prostate cancer
in part
were substituted
#8
walnuts
increase
nutrient profile of the diet
men (45-75 years; mean body mass index = 27.6 kg m(-2); n = 19) at risk for developing prostate cancer
-
improved
#9
walnuts
no change
beneficial effect on the diet quality
men (45-75 years; mean body mass index = 27.6 kg m(-2); n = 19) at risk for developing prostate cancer
-
was not optimized
#10
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Dietary guidance issued by various global government agencies recommends nut consumption within the context of a healthy-eating pattern. Nuts are nutrient dense and may promote nutrient adequacy. As an energy-dense food, nuts must replace other foods in the diet to prevent an excess of calories. METHODS: We evaluated how recommending the inclusion of walnuts (75 g day(-1) ) in the diet affected energy and nutrient intake in men (45-75 years; mean body mass index = 27.6 kg m(-2) ; n = 19) at risk for developing prostate cancer. Guidance was provided about incorporating walnuts isocalorically in a healthy diet. Three-day food records and body weight were collected at baseline and after two 8-week diet periods (usual versus walnut supplement diets). RESULTS: Energy intake on the walnut supplement diet exceeded the usual diet, although body weight was maintained. Energy intake was lower on the actual walnut supplement diet than the calculated walnut diet [10,865 kJ (2595 kcal) versus 11,325 kJ (2705 kcal) per day, respectively] and contributed 23% less energy than 75 g of walnuts. Approximately, 86% and 85% of the total fat and saturated fatty acids from walnuts were not displaced, whereas the increase in fibre from the usual diet to the actual walnut supplement diet represented less than one-half (39%) of the fibre provided by 75 g of walnuts. Walnuts were substituted, in part, for other foods, and the nutrient profile of the diet was improved, however, the beneficial effect of walnuts on the diet quality was not optimized. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals do not optimally implement food-based guidance. Consequently, nutrition professionals play a key role in teaching the implementation of food-based recommendations.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
AgedBody Mass IndexBody WeightCross-Over StudiesDietDiet RecordsDietary FatsDietary FiberEnergy IntakeFatty AcidsFatty Acids, MonounsaturatedFatty Acids, UnsaturatedHumansJuglansMaleMiddle AgedNutsPatient Compliance
Study Links
Quality Scores
SafetyNot Assessed
Efficacy65/10
Quality70/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations21
Citations/Year1.9
Relative Citation Ratio0.89
NIH Percentile45.8%
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.50
Weight Score1.51
Normalized Score0.60
Related Supplements