Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Effectiveness of two physical therapy interventions, relative to dental treatment in individuals with bruxism: study protocol of a randomized clinical trial.

Trials
January 1, 1970
Cinthia Santos Miotto Amorim et al. (5 authors)
Comparative StudyJournal ArticleRandomized Controlled TrialResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tHuman StudyClinical
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to compare the effectiveness of massage and stretching exercises with relaxation and imagination therapies and dental treatment in managing pain, mandibular range of motion, sleep quality, anxiety, stress, depression, and oral health in individuals with bruxism.

Results Summary

The study design suggests that massage and stretching exercises will be evaluated for their effects on bruxism-related symptoms, but specific results are not yet available as the study is ongoing. Outcomes will be measured using standardized scales for pain, sleep quality, and psychological factors.

Population

Adults with bruxism (awake or sleep bruxism).

Effective Dosage

Not specified

Duration

Evaluations will be performed immediately after treatment and at 2-month follow-up, but exact intervention duration is not specified.

Interactions

None mentioned

Extracted Claims (21)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
massage and stretching exercises
neutral
pain
individuals with bruxism
-
will be compared
#1
massage and stretching exercises
neutral
mandibular range of motion
individuals with bruxism
-
will be compared
#2
massage and stretching exercises
neutral
sleep quality
individuals with bruxism
-
will be compared
#3
massage and stretching exercises
neutral
anxiety
individuals with bruxism
-
will be compared
#4
massage and stretching exercises
neutral
stress
individuals with bruxism
-
will be compared
#5
massage and stretching exercises
neutral
depression
individuals with bruxism
-
will be compared
#6
massage and stretching exercises
neutral
oral health
individuals with bruxism
-
will be compared
#7
relaxation and imagination therapies
neutral
pain
individuals with bruxism
-
will be compared
#8
relaxation and imagination therapies
neutral
mandibular range of motion
individuals with bruxism
-
will be compared
#9
relaxation and imagination therapies
neutral
sleep quality
individuals with bruxism
-
will be compared
#10
relaxation and imagination therapies
neutral
anxiety
individuals with bruxism
-
will be compared
#11
relaxation and imagination therapies
neutral
stress
individuals with bruxism
-
will be compared
#12
relaxation and imagination therapies
neutral
depression
individuals with bruxism
-
will be compared
#13
relaxation and imagination therapies
neutral
oral health
individuals with bruxism
-
will be compared
#14
dental treatment
neutral
pain
individuals with bruxism
-
will be compared
#15
dental treatment
neutral
mandibular range of motion
individuals with bruxism
-
will be compared
#16
dental treatment
neutral
sleep quality
individuals with bruxism
-
will be compared
#17
dental treatment
neutral
anxiety
individuals with bruxism
-
will be compared
#18
dental treatment
neutral
stress
individuals with bruxism
-
will be compared
#19
dental treatment
neutral
depression
individuals with bruxism
-
will be compared
#20
dental treatment
neutral
oral health
individuals with bruxism
-
will be compared
#21
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Bruxism is a parafunctional habit characterized by grinding and/or clenching of the teeth. It may happen while awake (awake bruxism) or while sleeping (sleep bruxism). In adults, the prevalence is 20% for the awake bruxism and 8% for the sleep bruxism. Peripheral, central, and psychosocial factors influence the disorder, which may predispose to pain in the masticatory muscles and neck, headache, decreased pain thresholds in the masticatory and cervical muscles, limitation mandibular range of motion, sleep disorders, stress, anxiety, depression, and overall impairment of oral health. The aim of this study is to compare two distinct physical therapy interventions with dental treatment in pain, mandibular range of motion, sleep quality, anxiety, stress, depression, and oral health in individuals with bruxism. METHODS/DESIGN: Participants will be randomized into one of three groups: Group 1 (n=24) intervention will consist of massage and stretching exercises; Group 2 (n=24) will consist of relaxation and imagination therapies; and Group 3 (n=24) will receive dental treatment. The evaluations will be performed at baseline, immediately after treatment, and at 2-month follow-up. Pain intensity will be assessed using the visual analogical scale, while pain thresholds will be determined using dolorimetry. Mandibular range of motion will be assessed using digital pachymeter. Sleep quality will be assessed by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, anxiety by the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, stress by the Perceived Stress Scale-10, depression by the Beck Depression Inventory, and oral health will be assessed using the Oral Health Impact Profile--14. Significance level will be determined at the 5% level. DISCUSSION: This project describes the randomization method that will be used to compare two physical therapy interventions with dental treatment in the management of pain, mandibular range of motion, sleep quality, anxiety, stress, depression, and oral health in individuals with bruxism. The study will support the practice of evidence-based physical therapy for individuals with bruxism. Data will be published after study is completed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01778881.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
AnxietyBiomechanical PhenomenaBruxismClinical ProtocolsDelivery of Health CareDepressionFacial PainHumansImagery, PsychotherapyMandibleMassageMuscle Stretching ExercisesOral HealthPain MeasurementRange of Motion, ArticularResearch DesignSleepSleep Wake DisordersStress, PsychologicalSurveys and QuestionnairesTime FactorsTreatment Outcome
Study Links
Quality Scores
SafetyNot Assessed
Efficacy70/10
Quality85/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations5
Citations/Year0.5
Relative Citation Ratio0.35
NIH Percentile18.5%
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.25
Weight Score1.63
Normalized Score0.65
Related Supplements