Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Aromatherapy hand massage for older adults with chronic pain living in long-term care.

Journal of holistic nursing : official journal of the American Holistic Nurses' Association
December 1, 2014
Kathleen Cino
Journal ArticleRandomized Controlled TrialResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tHuman StudyClinical
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to examine the effectiveness of M technique hand massage, with and without aromatherapy, compared to nurse presence visits in reducing chronic pain among older adults in long-term care.

Results Summary

Participants experienced significant reductions in chronic pain intensity, with M technique hand massage (both with and without aromatherapy) showing greater effectiveness than nurse presence visits. The intervention notably improved pain and suffering scores and pain intensity measurements.

Population

Older adults living in long-term care facilities with chronic pain.

Effective Dosage

Twice weekly sessions for 4 weeks.

Duration

4 weeks

Interactions

None mentioned

Extracted Claims (7)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
aromatherapy M technique hand massage
decrease
chronic pain intensity
older adults with chronic pain living in long-term care facilities
-
significantly decreased
#1
M technique without aromatherapy
decrease
chronic pain intensity
older adults with chronic pain living in long-term care facilities
-
significantly decreased
#2
aromatherapy M technique hand massage
decrease
Geriatric Multidimensional Pain Inventory Pain and Suffering scores
older adults with chronic pain living in long-term care facilities
-
had a significant effect on
#3
M technique without aromatherapy
decrease
Geriatric Multidimensional Pain Inventory Pain and Suffering scores
older adults with chronic pain living in long-term care facilities
-
had a significant effect on
#4
aromatherapy M technique hand massage
decrease
Iowa Pain Thermometer scores
older adults with chronic pain living in long-term care facilities
-
differed significantly within groups
#5
M technique without aromatherapy
decrease
Iowa Pain Thermometer scores
older adults with chronic pain living in long-term care facilities
-
differed significantly within groups
#6
nurse presence
no change
chronic pain intensity
older adults with chronic pain living in long-term care facilities
-
compared to
#7
Abstract

PURPOSE: Older adults living in long-term care experience high rates of chronic pain. Concerns with pharmacologic management have spurred alternative approaches. The purpose of this study was to examine a nursing intervention for older adults with chronic pain. DESIGN: This prospective, randomized control trial compared the effect of aromatherapy M technique hand massage, M technique without aromatherapy, and nurse presence on chronic pain. Chronic pain was measured with the Geriatric Multidimensional Pain and Illness Inventory factors, pain and suffering, life interference, and emotional distress and the Iowa Pain Thermometer, a pain intensity scale. METHOD: Three groups of 39 to 40 participants recruited from seven long-term care facilities participated twice weekly for 4 weeks. Analysis included multivariate analysis of variance and analysis of variance. FINDINGS: Participants experienced decreased levels of chronic pain intensity. Group membership had a significant effect on the Geriatric Multidimensional Pain Inventory Pain and Suffering scores; Iowa Pain Thermometer scores differed significantly within groups. CONCLUSIONS: M technique hand massage with or without aromatherapy significantly decreased chronic pain intensity compared to nurse presence visits. M technique hand massage is a safe, simple, but effective intervention. Caregivers using it could improve chronic pain management in this population.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
AgedAged, 80 and overAromatherapyChronic PainFemaleHandHumansLong-Term CareMaleMassageMiddle AgedPain ManagementProspective StudiesQuality of Life
Study Links
Quality Scores
Safety90
Efficacy85/10
Quality80/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations14
Citations/Year1.3
Relative Citation Ratio0.85
NIH Percentile44.4%
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.50
Weight Score1.59
Normalized Score0.86
Related Supplements