Short-term effects of bright light therapy in adults with chronic nonspecific back pain: a randomized controlled trial.
Study Goal
The researchers aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of bright light therapy in reducing pain intensity and depressive symptoms in patients with chronic nonspecific back pain (CNBP).
Results Summary
The study found that bright light therapy significantly improved pain intensity and depressive symptoms compared to controls, with effect sizes of 0.46 and 0.86, respectively. No differences were observed between the intervention and sham groups.
Population
125 patients with chronic nonspecific back pain (CNBP) reporting pain intensity ≥3 on the Brief Pain Inventory.
Effective Dosage
5,000 lx (active treatment) or 230 lx (sham) for 3 supplementary light exposures over 3 weeks.
Duration
3 weeks
Interactions
None mentioned
| Intervention | Direction | Endpoint | Population | Dosage | Impact | Claim # |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
bright light therapy | increase | pain intensity | CNBP patients | 1.0 [0.8-1.6] | Changes in pain intensity were higher | #1 |
bright light therapy | increase | depression score | CNBP patients | 1.5 [0.0-2.5] | Changes in the depression score were also higher | #2 |
bright light therapy | no change | change scores | - | - | No differences were seen in change scores | #3 |
light therapy even in low dose | decrease | depressive symptoms | CNBP patients | - | could improve | #4 |
light therapy even in low dose | decrease | pain intensity | CNBP patients | - | reduce | #5 |
OBJECTIVE: The present trial evaluated incorporation of bright light therapy in the treatment of chronic nonspecific back pain (CNBP). DESIGN: A prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter, open design with three parallel trial arms was used. SETTING: Subjects received a novel therapeutic, an expected therapeutic ineffective low dose, or no light exposure at three different medical centers. PATIENTS: A total of 125 CNBP patients reporting pain intensity of ≥3 points on item 5 of the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) were included. INTERVENTION: Over 3 weeks, 36 active treatment, 36 placebo controls, and 33 controls received 3 or no supplementary light exposures of 5.000 lx or 230 lx, respectively. OUTCOME MEASURES: Changes in self-reported scores of pain intensity (BPI sub-score 1) and depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Questionnaire) were the primary outcome measures. Secondary outcome measures were changes in self-reported overall pain sensation (BPI total score), grade of everyday life impairment (BPI sub-score 2), mood (visual analog scale), and well-being (World Health Organization-Five Well-Being Index). RESULTS: Changes in pain intensity were higher (1.0 [0.8-1.6]) in the bright light group compared with controls (0.3 [-0.1-0.8]; effect size D = 0.46). Changes in the depression score were also higher in the intervention group (1.5 [0.0-2.5]) compared with controls (0.0 [0.0-2.0]; effect size D = 0.86). No differences were seen in change scores between intervention vs sham group. CONCLUSION: The present randomized controlled trial shows that light therapy even in low dose could improve depressive symptoms and reduce pain intensity in CNBP patients. Further research is needed for optimizing parameters of frequency, dose, and duration of therapeutic light exposure.