Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Potential role of milk fat globule membrane in modulating plasma lipoproteins, gene expression, and cholesterol metabolism in humans: a randomized study.

The American journal of clinical nutrition
July 1, 2015
Fredrik Rosqvist et al. (9 authors)
Journal ArticleRandomized Controlled TrialResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tHuman StudyClinical
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to investigate whether the effects of milk fat on plasma lipids and cardiometabolic risk markers are modulated by the milk fat globule membrane (MFGM) content.

Results Summary

The study found that milk fat enclosed by MFGM (whipping cream) did not impair the lipoprotein profile, unlike milk fat without MFGM (butter oil), which increased plasma lipids. Nineteen genes were differentially regulated between groups, mostly correlating with lipid changes.

Population

Overweight men and women (n = 57).

Effective Dosage

40 g milk fat/day as either whipping cream or butter oil.

Duration

8 weeks.

Interactions

None mentioned.

Extracted Claims (18)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
butter
increase
plasma low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol
-
-
can increase
#1
control diet (butter oil)
increase
total cholesterol
overweight men and women
+0.30 ± 0.49 mmol/L
increased
#2
MFGM diet (whipping cream)
no change
total cholesterol
overweight men and women
-0.04 ± 0.49 mmol/L
did not increase
#3
control diet (butter oil)
increase
LDL cholesterol
overweight men and women
+0.36 ± 0.50 mmol/L
increased
#4
MFGM diet (whipping cream)
no change
LDL cholesterol
overweight men and women
+0.04 ± 0.36 mmol/L
did not increase
#5
control diet (butter oil)
increase
apolipoprotein B:apolipoprotein A-I ratio
overweight men and women
+0.03 ± 0.09 mmol/L
increased
#6
MFGM diet (whipping cream)
decrease
apolipoprotein B:apolipoprotein A-I ratio
overweight men and women
-0.05 ± 0.10 mmol/L
decreased
#7
control diet (butter oil)
increase
non-HDL cholesterol
overweight men and women
+0.24 ± 0.49 mmol/L
increased
#8
MFGM diet (whipping cream)
decrease
non-HDL cholesterol
overweight men and women
-0.14 ± 0.51 mmol/L
decreased
#9
MFGM diet (whipping cream)
no change
HDL-cholesterol
overweight men and women
-
did not differ
#10
MFGM diet (whipping cream)
no change
triglyceride
overweight men and women
-
did not differ
#11
MFGM diet (whipping cream)
no change
sitosterol
overweight men and women
-
did not differ
#12
MFGM diet (whipping cream)
no change
lathosterol
overweight men and women
-
did not differ
#13
MFGM diet (whipping cream)
no change
campesterol
overweight men and women
-
did not differ
#14
MFGM diet (whipping cream)
no change
proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 plasma concentrations
overweight men and women
-
did not differ
#15
MFGM diet (whipping cream)
no change
fatty acid compositions
overweight men and women
-
did not differ
#16
milk fat without MFGM
increase
lipoprotein profile
-
-
impair
#17
milk fat enclosed by MFGM
no change
lipoprotein profile
-
-
does not impair
#18
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Butter is rich in saturated fat [saturated fatty acids (SFAs)] and can increase plasma low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, which is a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease. However, compared with other dairy foods, butter is low in milk fat globule membrane (MFGM) content, which encloses the fat. We hypothesized that different dairy foods may have distinct effects on plasma lipids because of a varying content of MFGM. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate whether the effects of milk fat on plasma lipids and cardiometabolic risk markers are modulated by the MFGM content. DESIGN: The study was an 8-wk, single-blind, randomized, controlled isocaloric trial with 2 parallel groups including overweight men and women (n = 57 randomly assigned). For the intervention, subjects consumed 40 g milk fat/d as either whipping cream (MFGM diet) or butter oil (control diet). Intervention foods were matched for total fat, protein, carbohydrates, and calcium. Subjects were discouraged from consuming any other dairy products during the study. Plasma markers of cholesterol absorption and hepatic cholesterol metabolism were assessed together with global gene-expression analyses in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. RESULTS: As expected, the control diet increased plasma lipids, whereas the MFGM diet did not [total cholesterol (±SD): +0.30 ± 0.49 compared with -0.04 ± 0.49 mmol/L, respectively (P = 0.024); LDL cholesterol: +0.36 ± 0.50 compared with +0.04 ± 0.36 mmol/L, respectively (P = 0.024); apolipoprotein B:apolipoprotein A-I ratio: +0.03 ± 0.09 compared with -0.05 ± 0.10 mmol/L, respectively (P = 0.007); and non-HDL cholesterol: +0.24 ± 0.49 compared with -0.14 ± 0.51 mmol/L, respectively (P = 0.013)]. HDL-cholesterol, triglyceride, sitosterol, lathosterol, campesterol, and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 plasma concentrations and fatty acid compositions did not differ between groups. Nineteen genes were differentially regulated between groups, and these genes were mostly correlated with lipid changes. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to milk fat without MFGM, milk fat enclosed by MFGM does not impair the lipoprotein profile. The mechanism is not clear although suppressed gene expression by MFGM correlated inversely with plasma lipids. The food matrix should be considered when evaluating cardiovascular aspects of different dairy foods. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01767077.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
AdultAgedApolipoprotein A-IApolipoproteins BBody Mass IndexCholesterolCholesterol, HDLCholesterol, LDLDairy ProductsEnergy IntakeFatty AcidsFeeding BehaviorFemaleGene ExpressionGlycolipidsGlycoproteinsHealthy VolunteersHomeostasisHumansLeukocytes, MononuclearLipid DropletsMaleMiddle AgedNutrition AssessmentPhytosterolsProprotein Convertase 9Proprotein ConvertasesSerine EndopeptidasesSingle-Blind MethodSitosterolsTriglyceridesYoung Adult
Study Links
Quality Scores
Safety85
Efficacy75/10
Quality80/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations89
Citations/Year8.9
Relative Citation Ratio4.04
NIH Percentile90.3%
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.95
Weight Score1.94
Normalized Score0.80
Related Supplements