Comparison of venlafaxine alone versus venlafaxine plus bright light therapy combination for severe major depressive disorder.
Study Goal
The researchers aimed to assess the efficiency of bright light therapy as an adjuvant treatment to venlafaxine in patients with severe major depressive disorder (MDD).
Results Summary
Bright light therapy combined with venlafaxine produced significantly stronger and more rapid improvements in depressive symptoms compared to venlafaxine alone, with notable differences in HDRS, BDI, and POMS scores by the second week. By week 4, 76% of the combination therapy group achieved mild depression (HDRS ≤ 13), compared to 44% in the venlafaxine-only group.
Population
50 inpatients with severe MDD diagnosed via DSM-IV-TR at a university hospital.
Effective Dosage
60-minute light exposure at 7000 lux daily at 7:00 AM, combined with 150 mg venlafaxine hydrochloride daily.
Duration
8 weeks
Interactions
None mentioned
| Intervention | Direction | Endpoint | Population | Dosage | Impact | Claim # |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
bright light therapy | decrease | major depressive disorder | - | - | is an effective and safe treatment | #1 |
bright light therapy | increase | mood | - | - | exerts rapid mood-elevating activity | #2 |
150 mg venlafaxine hydrochloride daily | decrease | depression and negative mood states | inpatients with severe MDD | - | significantly improved | #3 |
150 mg venlafaxine plus 60-minute light of 7000 lux (venlafaxine + bright light therapy) | decrease | depression and negative mood states | inpatients with severe MDD | - | significantly improved | #4 |
venlafaxine + bright light therapy | decrease | HDRS depression scores | inpatients with severe MDD | - | evidenced significantly lower | #5 |
venlafaxine + bright light therapy | decrease | BDI scores | inpatients with severe MDD | - | evidenced significantly lower | #6 |
venlafaxine + bright light therapy | decrease | POMS negative mood states scores | inpatients with severe MDD | - | evidenced significantly lower | #7 |
venlafaxine + bright light therapy | decrease | HDRS score ≤ 13 | inpatients with severe MDD | 76% | attained the target goal of treatment | #8 |
venlafaxine | decrease | HDRS score ≤ 13 | inpatients with severe MDD | 44% | attained the target goal of treatment | #9 |
venlafaxine + bright light therapy | decrease | HDRS score ≤ 7 | inpatients with severe MDD | 76% | experienced complete remission of depression | #10 |
venlafaxine | decrease | HDRS score ≤ 7 | inpatients with severe MDD | 64% | experienced complete remission of depression | #11 |
venlafaxine | decrease | depressive mood | patients with severe MDD | - | significantly reversed | #12 |
venlafaxine + bright light therapy | decrease | depressive mood | patients with severe MDD | - | significantly reversed | #13 |
venlafaxine + bright light therapy | decrease | depressive mood | patients with severe MDD | - | induced significantly stronger and more rapid beneficial effects | #14 |
OBJECTIVE: Phototherapy, ie, bright light therapy, is an effective and safe treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD). It exerts rapid mood-elevating activity, similar to antidepressant medications, most likely mediated through both monoaminergic and circadian system melatonergic mechanisms. We assessed the efficiency of bright light therapy as an adjuvant treatment to antidepressant pharmacotherapy in patients with severe MDD randomized by Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) score to either (1) 150 mg venlafaxine hydrochloride daily at 7:00 AM or (2) 150 mg venlafaxine plus 60-minute light of 7000 lux the initial week of clinical management (venlafaxine + bright light therapy) daily at 7:00 AM. METHOD: 50 inpatients with severe MDD at the Psychiatry Clinic of Yüzüncü Yıl University Training and Education Hospital participated. The study, which was conducted from January 2013 through June 2014, entailed patients diagnosed with severe MDD based on DSM-IV-TR for the first time. Mood states were assessed by the HDRS, Profile of Mood States (POMS), and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) before treatment and at 1, 2, 4, and 8 weeks of treatment. RESULTS: On the basis of the HDRS score as the primary outcome variable, both strategies significantly improved depression and negative mood states already at the first treatment week (P < .001). Differences in therapeutic effects by treatment strategy were remarkable at the second and fourth weeks of clinical management (P = .018 and P = .011, respectively), with beneficial effects continuing until trial conclusion. Those treated with venlafaxine + bright light therapy evidenced significantly lower HDRS depression scores (P < .05) as well as BDI scores (P < .05) and POMS negative mood states scores (depression-dejection, tension-anxiety, anger-hostility, fatigue-inertia, and confusion-bewilderment subscales; all P < .05) after the second week. At week 4 of the trial, 19 (76%) of the 25 venlafaxine + bright light therapy patients versus just 11 (44%) of the 25 venlafaxine patients (P < .05) attained the target goal of treatment, a HDRS score ≤ 13, indicative of mild depression, and, although not statistically significant in our small sample study (P = .36), at week 8, 76% of venlafaxine + bright light therapy patients (n = 19) versus just 64% of the venlafaxine patients (n = 16) experienced complete remission of depression (HDRS score ≤ 7). CONCLUSIONS: Both venlafaxine and venlafaxine + bright light therapy treatment strategies significantly reversed the depressive mood of patients with severe MDD; however, the latter induced significantly stronger and more rapid beneficial effects. Future longer-term studies with large sample sizes, nonetheless, are required to confirm and generalize these results to patients of diverse ethnicities and cultures with both severe and mild MDD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ANZCTR.org.au registration number: ACTRN12614001061628.