Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

The effect of massage therapy and/or exercise therapy on subacute or long-lasting neck pain--the Stockholm neck trial (STONE): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Trials
January 1, 1970
Eva Skillgate et al. (6 authors)
Comparative StudyJournal ArticleRandomized Controlled TrialResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tHuman StudyClinical
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to determine the effectiveness of massage therapy, alone or combined with exercise therapy, for improving pain intensity and pain-related disability in individuals with subacute or long-lasting nonspecific neck pain over one year.

Results Summary

The abstract describes the study protocol but does not report results, as the trial was ongoing at the time of publication.

Population

Individuals with subacute or long-lasting nonspecific neck pain.

Effective Dosage

Not specified

Duration

Outcomes measured at 7, 12, 26, and 52 weeks after inclusion.

Interactions

None mentioned

Extracted Claims (4)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
massage therapy
neutral
subacute and long-lasting neck pain
study participants with subacute or long-lasting nonspecific neck pain
-
determine the effect
#1
exercise therapy
neutral
subacute and long-lasting neck pain
study participants with subacute or long-lasting nonspecific neck pain
-
determine the effect
#2
exercise therapy plus massage therapy
neutral
subacute and long-lasting neck pain
study participants with subacute or long-lasting nonspecific neck pain
-
determine the effect
#3
advice to stay active
neutral
subacute and long-lasting neck pain
study participants with subacute or long-lasting nonspecific neck pain
-
determine the effect
#4
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Neck pain is a major health problem in populations worldwide and an economic burden in modern societies due to its high prevalence and costs in terms of health care expenditures and lost productivity. Massage and exercise therapy are widely used management options for neck pain. However, there is a lack of scientific evidence regarding their effectiveness for subacute and long-lasting neck pain. This study protocol describes a randomized controlled trial aiming to determine the effect of massage and/or exercise therapy on subacute and long-lasting neck pain over the course of 1 year. METHODS/DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial in which at least 600 study participants with subacute or long-lasting nonspecific neck pain will be recruited and randomly allocated to one of four treatment arms: massage therapy (A), exercise therapy (B), exercise therapy plus massage therapy (C) and advice to stay active (D). The study has an E-health approach, and study participants are being recruited through advertising with a mix of traditional and online marketing channels. Web-based self-report questionnaires measure the main outcomes at 7, 12, 26 and 52 weeks after inclusion. The primary outcomes are a clinically important improvement in pain intensity and pain-related disability at follow-up, measured with a modified version of the Chronic Pain Questionnaire (CPQ). The secondary outcomes are global improvement, health-related quality of life (EQ-5D), sick leave, drug consumption and healthcare utilization. Adverse events are measured by questionnaires at return visits to the clinic, and automated text messages (SMSes) survey neck pain intensity and pain-related disability every week over one year. DISCUSSION: The results of this study will provide clinicians and stakeholders much needed knowledge to plan medical care for subacute and long-lasting neck pain disorders. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN01453590. Date of registration: 3 July 2014.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
AdolescentAdultAgedClinical ProtocolsCombined Modality TherapyCost-Benefit AnalysisDisability EvaluationExercise TherapyFemaleHealth Care CostsHumansMaleMassageMiddle AgedNeck PainPain MeasurementResearch DesignSurveys and QuestionnairesSwedenTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeYoung Adult
Study Links
Quality Scores
SafetyNot Assessed
Quality85/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations10
Citations/Year1.0
Relative Citation Ratio0.62
NIH Percentile33.7%
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.50
Weight Score1.72
Normalized Score0.57
Related Supplements