Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Comparison of a Restricted and Unrestricted Vegan Diet Plan with a Restricted Omnivorous Diet Plan on Health-Specific Measures.

Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland)
July 14, 2015
Richard J Bloomer et al. (3 authors)
Journal ArticleHuman Study
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to compare the health effects of a traditional Daniel Fast (restricted vegan), a modified Daniel Fast (restricted omnivorous), and an unrestricted vegan diet on anthropometric and biochemical measures.

Results Summary

The modified DF (omnivorous) showed a 10% decrease in total and LDL cholesterol, a 5 mmHg reduction in systolic BP, and a 2 mmHg reduction in diastolic BP, but no significant changes in insulin or oxidative stress markers compared to the traditional DF.

Population

35 subjects (6 men, 29 women) aged 18-67 years.

Effective Dosage

Ad libitum meat and skim milk consumption (modified DF).

Duration

21 days.

Interactions

None mentioned.

Extracted Claims (16)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
traditional Daniel Fast (restricted vegan)
increase
perceived mental and physical health
subjects in the traditional DF group
10%
reported an approximate 10% increase
#1
traditional Daniel Fast (restricted vegan)
decrease
malondialdehyde
subjects in the traditional DF group
25%
25% reduction
#2
traditional Daniel Fast (restricted vegan)
decrease
blood insulin
subjects in the traditional DF group
33%
33% reduction
#3
traditional Daniel Fast (restricted vegan)
decrease
Systolic BP
subjects assigned to the traditional DF
7 mmHg
reduced approximately 7 mmHg
#4
modified Daniel Fast (restricted omnivorous)
decrease
Systolic BP
subjects assigned to the modified DF
5 mmHg
approximate 5 mmHg reduction
#5
unrestricted vegan diet plan
decrease
Systolic BP
subjects assigned to the unrestricted vegan plan
5 mmHg
approximate 5 mmHg reduction
#6
traditional Daniel Fast (restricted vegan)
decrease
diastolic BP
subjects in both DF groups
2 mmHg
small (2 mmHg) reduction
#7
modified Daniel Fast (restricted omnivorous)
decrease
diastolic BP
subjects in both DF groups
2 mmHg
small (2 mmHg) reduction
#8
unrestricted vegan diet plan
increase
diastolic BP
subjects assigned to the unrestricted vegan group
slight
slight increase
#9
traditional Daniel Fast (restricted vegan)
decrease
total and LDL cholesterol
subjects in the traditional DF group
20%
approximate 20% reduction
#10
modified Daniel Fast (restricted omnivorous)
decrease
total and LDL cholesterol
subjects in the modified DF group
10%
approximate 10% decrease
#11
unrestricted vegan diet plan
no change
total or LDL cholesterol
subjects in the unrestricted vegan group
no significant change
No decrease
#12
traditional Daniel Fast (restricted vegan)
decrease
blood insulin
-
significant
results in a significant reduction
#13
traditional Daniel Fast (restricted vegan)
decrease
oxidative stress
-
significant
results in a significant reduction
#14
unrestricted vegan diet plan
increase
systolic blood pressure
-
-
may improve
#15
unrestricted vegan diet plan
no change
other markers of health measured in the present study
-
-
does not favorably impact
#16
Abstract

BACKGROUND: We have previously noted beneficial health outcomes when individuals follow a dietary restriction plan in accordance with the Daniel Fast (DF). This is true whether individuals eliminate all animal products or include small amounts of meat and dairy in their plan. The present study sought to compare anthropometric and biochemical measures of health in individuals following a traditional DF (i.e., restricted vegan) or modified DF (i.e., restricted omnivorous; inclusive of ad libitum meat and skim milk consumption), with those following an unrestricted vegan diet plan. METHODS: 35 subjects (six men; 29 women; 33 ± 2 years; range: 18-67 years) completed a 21-day diet plan. Subjects reported to the lab for pre- (day 1) and post-intervention testing (day 22) in a 10 h fasted state. Blood samples were collected and assayed for complete blood count, metabolic panel, lipid panel, insulin, HOMA-IR, C-reactive protein, and oxidative stress biomarkers (malondialdehyde, advanced oxidation protein products, and nitrate/nitrite). Heart rate and blood pressure were measured and body composition was determined via dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Subjects' self-reported compliance, mental and physical health, and satiety in relation to the dietary modification were recorded. RESULTS: No interaction effects were noted for our outcome measures (p > 0.05). However, subjects in the traditional DF group reported an approximate 10% increase in perceived mental and physical health, with a 25% reduction in malondialdehyde and a 33% reduction in blood insulin. Systolic BP was reduced approximately 7 mmHg in subjects assigned to the traditional DF, with an approximate 5 mmHg reduction in subjects assigned to the modified DF and the unrestricted vegan plan. A small (2 mmHg) reduction in diastolic BP was noted for subjects in both DF groups; a slight increase in diastolic BP was noted for subjects assigned to the unrestricted vegan group. An approximate 20% reduction was noted in total and LDL cholesterol for subjects in the traditional DF group, with an approximate 10% decrease for subjects in the modified DF group. No decrease in total or LDL cholesterol was noted for subjects in the unrestricted vegan group. CONCLUSION: These data indicate that both a traditional or modified DF may improve blood pressure and blood lipids in a clinically meaningful manner if these results are sustained over the long term. A traditional DF also results in a significant reduction in blood insulin and oxidative stress. An unrestricted vegan diet may improve systolic blood pressure, but in the absence of measures to strictly monitor adherence, it does not favorably impact other markers of health measured in the present study.

Study Links
Quality Scores
Safety85
Efficacy75/10
Quality70/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations12
Citations/Year1.2
Relative Citation Ratio0.57
NIH Percentile30.9%
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.50
Weight Score0.77
Normalized Score0.78
Related Supplements