A pilot feeding study for adults with asthma: The healthy eating better breathing trial.
Study Goal
The researchers aimed to assess the feasibility of a dietary trial and the preliminary impact of a healthy diet, including lutein, on asthma outcomes.
Results Summary
Serum carotenoids, including lutein, increased during the dietary intervention compared to the control diet, but there was no consistent effect on asthma outcomes.
Population
Adults with asthma (average age 42, predominantly female and African American).
Effective Dosage
Not specified
Duration
4 weeks
Interactions
None mentioned
| Intervention | Direction | Endpoint | Population | Dosage | Impact | Claim # |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
healthy diet rich in unsaturated fat | increase | fruit intake | participants with asthma | - | significant increases | #1 |
healthy diet rich in unsaturated fat | increase | vegetable intake | participants with asthma | - | significant increases | #2 |
healthy diet rich in unsaturated fat | increase | omega-3 fatty acid intake | participants with asthma | - | significant increases | #3 |
healthy diet rich in unsaturated fat | increase | serum carotenoids (eg. lutein and beta-cryptoxanthin) | participants with asthma | - | increased | #4 |
healthy diet rich in unsaturated fat | decrease | total cholesterol | participants with asthma | - | decreased | #5 |
healthy diet rich in unsaturated fat | no change | asthma outcomes | participants with asthma | - | no consistent effect | #6 |
RATIONALE: Evidence from observational studies and to a lesser extent clinical trials suggest that a healthy diet may improve symptoms and lung function in patients with asthma. We conducted a pilot study to determine the feasibility of conducting a larger scale dietary trial and to provide preliminary evidence on the impact of a healthy diet on asthma outcomes. METHODS: In a randomized, two period cross-over trial, participants with asthma received a 4-week dietary intervention followed by a usual diet (or vice versa), separated by a 4-week washout. The dietary intervention was a healthy diet rich in unsaturated fat. During the dietary intervention, participants ate three meals per week on site at the Johns Hopkins ProHealth Research Center. All remaining meals and snacks were provided for participants to consume off-site. During the control diet, participants were instructed to continue their usual dietary intake. Relevant biomarkers and asthma clinical outcomes were assessed at 0, 2, and 4 weeks after starting each arm of the study. RESULTS: Eleven participants were randomized, and seven completed the full study protocol. Among these seven participants, average age was 42 years, six were female, and six were African American. Participant self-report of dietary intake revealed significant increases in fruit, vegetable, and omega-3 fatty acid intake with the dietary intervention compared to usual diet. Serum carotenoids (eg. lutein and beta-cryptoxanthin) increased in the intervention versus control. Total cholesterol decreased in the intervention versus control diet. There was no consistent effect on asthma outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that a feeding trial in participants with asthma is feasible. Larger trials are needed to definitively assess the potential benefits of dietary interventions on pulmonary symptoms and function in patients with asthma.