Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Adjunctive Bright Light Therapy for Bipolar Depression: A Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial.

The American journal of psychiatry
January 1, 1970
Dorothy K Sit et al. (12 authors)
Journal ArticleRandomized Controlled TrialResearch Support, N.I.H., ExtramuralResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tHuman StudyClinical
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to determine the efficacy of midday bright light therapy for bipolar depression, focusing on remission rates, symptom levels, and mood polarity switches.

Results Summary

Bright white light therapy significantly improved remission rates (68.2% vs. 22.2%) and reduced depression scores compared to placebo, with no observed mood polarity switches. Sleep quality improved in both groups without significant differences.

Population

Adults with bipolar I or II disorder experiencing depression, on stable antimanic medication, excluding those with hypomania, mania, mixed symptoms, or rapid cycling.

Effective Dosage

7,000-lux bright white light (intervention) vs. 50-lux dim red light (placebo).

Duration

6 weeks

Interactions

None mentioned

Extracted Claims (5)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
adjunctive bright light therapy at midday
increase
remission rate
depressed adults with bipolar I or II disorder
68.2% compared with 22.2%
significantly higher remission rate
#1
adjunctive bright light therapy at midday
decrease
depression scores
depressed adults with bipolar I or II disorder
9.2 (SD=6.6) compared with 14.9 (SD=9.2)
significantly lower depression scores
#2
adjunctive bright light therapy at midday
no change
mood polarity switch
depressed adults with bipolar I or II disorder
-
no mood polarity switches were observed
#3
adjunctive bright light therapy at midday
increase
sleep quality
depressed adults with bipolar I or II disorder
-
sleep quality improved
#4
adjunctive bright light therapy at midday
no change
sleep quality
depressed adults with bipolar I or II disorder
-
did not differ significantly
#5
Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Patients with bipolar disorder have recurrent major depression, residual mood symptoms, and limited treatment options. Building on promising pilot data, the authors conducted a 6-week randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial to investigate the efficacy of adjunctive bright light therapy at midday for bipolar depression. The aims were to determine remission rate, depression symptom level, and rate of mood polarity switch, as well as to explore sleep quality. METHOD: The study enrolled depressed adults with bipolar I or II disorder who were receiving stable dosages of antimanic medication (excluding patients with hypomania or mania, mixed symptoms, or rapid cycling). Patients were randomly assigned to treatment with either 7,000-lux bright white light or 50-lux dim red placebo light (N=23 for each group). Symptoms were assessed weekly with the Structured Interview Guide for the Hamilton Depression Scale With Atypical Depression Supplement (SIGH-ADS), the Mania Rating Scale, and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. Remission was defined as having a SIGH-ADS score of 8 or less. RESULTS: At baseline, both groups had moderate depression and no hypomanic or manic symptoms. Compared with the placebo light group, the group treated with bright white light experienced a significantly higher remission rate (68.2% compared with 22.2%; adjusted odds ratio=12.6) at weeks 4-6 and significantly lower depression scores (9.2 [SD=6.6] compared with 14.9 [SD=9.2]; adjusted β=-5.91) at the endpoint visit. No mood polarity switches were observed. Sleep quality improved in both groups and did not differ significantly between them. CONCLUSIONS: The data from this study provide robust evidence that supports the efficacy of midday bright light therapy for bipolar depression.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
AdultAntimanic AgentsBipolar DisorderCombined Modality TherapyDepressionDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOdds RatioPhototherapySleepTreatment Outcome
Study Links
Quality Scores
SafetyNot Assessed
Efficacy85/10
Quality90/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations103
Citations/Year14.7
Relative Citation Ratio5.70
NIH Percentile94.4%
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.95
Weight Score2.11
Normalized Score0.72
Related Supplements