Clinical efficacy, onset time and safety of bright light therapy in acute bipolar depression as an adjunctive therapy: A randomized controlled trial.
Study Goal
The study aimed to examine the efficacy, onset time, and clinical safety of bright light therapy (BLT) as an adjunctive treatment for acute bipolar depression, not DIM.
Results Summary
The study found that BLT was more effective than dim red light therapy (dRLT) in treating bipolar depression, with a response rate of 78.19% vs. 43.33%, and no reported hypomania or serious adverse events.
Population
Patients with acute bipolar depression.
Effective Dosage
Not applicable (study used light therapy, not DIM).
Duration
2 weeks (1 hour every morning).
Interactions
None mentioned.
| Intervention | Direction | Endpoint | Population | Dosage | Impact | Claim # |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bright light therapy (BLT) | decrease | bipolar depression | patients with acute bipolar depression | response rates of 78.19% vs. 43.33% | showed a greater ameliorative effect | #1 |
Bright light therapy (BLT) | neutral | onset time | BLT group | 4.33 days | onset day | #2 |
Bright light therapy (BLT) | no change | symptoms of hypomania | participants | No participants | No participants experienced | #3 |
Bright light therapy (BLT) | no change | adverse events | - | No serious adverse events | No serious adverse events were reported | #4 |
BACKGROUND: Bright light therapy (BLT) is an effective treatment for seasonal affective disorder and non- seasonal depression. The efficacy of BLT in treating patients with bipolar disorder is still unknown. AIMS: The aim of this study is to examine the efficacy, onset time and clinical safety of BLT in treating patients with acute bipolar depression as an adjunctive therapy (trial registration at ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02009371). METHODS: This was a multi-center, single blind, randomized clinical trial. Seventy-four participants were randomized in one of two treatment conditions: BLT and control (dim red light therapy, dRLT). Sixty-three participants completed the study (33 BLT, 30 dRLT). Light therapy lasted for two weeks, one hour every morning. All participants were required to complete several scales assessments at baseline, and at the end of weeks 1 and 2. The primary outcome measures were the clinical efficacy of BLT which was assessed by the reduction rate of HAMD-17 scores, and the onset time of BLT which was assessed by the reduction rate of QIDS-SR16 scores. The secondary outcome measures were rates of switch into hypomania or mania and adverse events. RESULTS: 1) Clinical efficacy: BLT showed a greater ameliorative effect on bipolar depression than the control, with response rates of 78.19% vs. 43.33% respectively (p < 0.01). 2) Onset day: Median onset day was 4.33 days in BLT group. 3) BLT-emergent hypomania: No participants experienced symptoms of hypomania. 4) Side effects: No serious adverse events were reported. CONCLUSION: BLT can be considered as an effective and safe adjunctive treatment for patients with acute bipolar depression.