Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Mindfulness-Based Interventions for Anxiety and Depression.

The Psychiatric clinics of North America
December 1, 2017
Stefan G Hofmann et al. (2 authors)
Journal ArticleReviewHuman Study
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to review how mindfulness practices contribute to cognitive and behavioral treatments for depression and anxiety.

Results Summary

Mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) effectively reduce anxiety and depression symptom severity, outperform non-evidence-based treatments and active controls, and perform comparably with cognitive behavior therapy (CBT).

Population

A range of individuals with depression and anxiety.

Effective Dosage

Not specified

Duration

Not specified

Interactions

None mentioned

Extracted Claims (3)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs)
decrease
anxiety and depression symptom severity
a range of individuals
-
effective in reducing
#1
mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs)
neutral
-
-
-
consistently outperform
#2
mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs)
no change
-
-
-
perform comparably with
#3
Abstract

This article reviews the ways in which mindfulness practices have contributed to cognitive and behavioral treatments for depression and anxiety. Research on mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) has increased rapidly in the past decade. The most common include mindfulness-based stress reduction and mindfulness-based cognitive therapy. MBIs are effective in reducing anxiety and depression symptom severity in a range of individuals. MBIs consistently outperform non-evidence-based treatments and active control conditions, such as health education, relaxation training, and supportive psychotherapy. MBIs also perform comparably with cognitive behavior therapy (CBT). The treatment principles of MBIs for anxiety and depression are compatible with standard CBT.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
Anxiety DisordersDepressive DisorderHumansMindfulness
Study Links
Quality Scores
SafetyNot Assessed
Efficacy85/10
Quality80/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations302
Citations/Year37.8
Relative Citation Ratio18.37
NIH Percentile99.3%
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.95
Weight Score2.40
Normalized Score0.70
Related Supplements