Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Efficacy and Safety of Pediatric Prolonged-Release Melatonin for Insomnia in Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
November 1, 2017
Paul Gringras et al. (5 authors)
Journal ArticleRandomized Controlled TrialHuman StudyClinical
Study Details

Study Goal

To assess the efficacy and safety of prolonged-release melatonin minitablets (PedPRM) versus placebo for treating insomnia in children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and neurogenetic disorders (NGD).

Results Summary

PedPRM significantly increased total sleep time by 57.5 minutes compared to 9.14 minutes with placebo and reduced sleep latency by 39.6 minutes versus 12.5 minutes with placebo. The treatment was generally safe, with somnolence being the most commonly reported adverse effect.

Population

Children and adolescents (2-17.5 years) with ASD (96.8%) or Smith-Magenis syndrome (3.2%) who had unimproved sleep despite behavioral interventions.

Effective Dosage

2 mg escalated to 5 mg.

Duration

13 weeks.

Interactions

None mentioned.

Extracted Claims (9)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
novel pediatric-appropriate, prolonged-release melatonin minitablets (PedPRM)
increase
total sleep time (TST)
children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), with or without attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) comorbidity, and neurogenetic disorders (NGD)
57.5 minutes
slept on average longer at night
#1
placebo
increase
total sleep time (TST)
children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), with or without attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) comorbidity, and neurogenetic disorders (NGD)
9.14 minutes
slept on average longer at night
#2
PedPRM
decrease
sleep latency (SL)
children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), with or without attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) comorbidity, and neurogenetic disorders (NGD)
39.6 minutes
decreased
#3
placebo
decrease
sleep latency (SL)
children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), with or without attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) comorbidity, and neurogenetic disorders (NGD)
12.5 minutes
decreased
#4
PedPRM
increase
TST and/or SL
children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), with or without attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) comorbidity, and neurogenetic disorders (NGD)
68.9%
rate of participants attaining clinically meaningful responses was significantly higher
#5
placebo
increase
TST and/or SL
children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), with or without attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) comorbidity, and neurogenetic disorders (NGD)
39.3%
rate of participants attaining clinically meaningful responses
#6
PedPRM
decrease
overall sleep disturbance (CSDI)
children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), with or without attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) comorbidity, and neurogenetic disorders (NGD)
-
tended to decrease
#7
PedPRM
no change
safety
children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), with or without attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) comorbidity, and neurogenetic disorders (NGD)
-
was generally safe
#8
PedPRM
increase
somnolence
children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), with or without attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) comorbidity, and neurogenetic disorders (NGD)
-
was more commonly reported
#9
Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of novel pediatric-appropriate, prolonged-release melatonin minitablets (PedPRM) versus placebo for insomnia in children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), with or without attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) comorbidity, and neurogenetic disorders (NGD). METHOD: A total of 125 children and adolescents (2-17.5 years of age; 96.8% ASD, 3.2% Smith-Magenis syndrome [SMS]) whose sleep failed to improve on behavioral intervention alone were randomized (1:1 ratio), double-blind, to receive PedPRM (2 mg escalated to 5 mg) or placebo for 13 weeks. Sleep measures included the validated caregivers' Sleep and Nap Diary (SND) and Composite Sleep Disturbance Index (CSDI). The a priori primary endpoint was SND-reported total sleep time (TST) after 13 weeks of treatment. RESULTS: The study met the primary endpoint: after 13 weeks of double-blind treatment, participants slept on average 57.5 minutes longer at night with PedPRM compared to 9.14 minutes with placebo (adjusted mean treatment difference PedPRM-placebo -32.43 minutes; p = .034). Sleep latency (SL) decreased by 39.6 minutes on average with PedPRM and 12.5 minutes with placebo (adjusted mean treatment difference -25.30 minutes; p = .011) without causing earlier wakeup time. The rate of participants attaining clinically meaningful responses in TST and/or SL was significantly higher with PedPRM than with placebo (68.9% versus 39.3% respectively; p = .001) corresponding to a number needed to treat (NNT) of 3.38. Overall sleep disturbance (CSDI) tended to decrease. PedPRM was generally safe; somnolence was more commonly reported with PedPRM than placebo. CONCLUSION: PedPRM was efficacious and safe for treatment of insomnia in children and adolescents with ASD with/without ADHD and NGD. The acceptability of this pediatric formulation in a population who usually experience significant difficulties in swallowing was remarkably high. Clinical trial registration information-Efficacy and Safety of Circadin in the Treatment of Sleep Disturbances in Children With Neurodevelopment Disabilities; http://clinicaltrials.gov/; NCT01906866.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
AdolescentAttention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityAutism Spectrum DisorderCentral Nervous System DepressantsChildChild, PreschoolDelayed-Action PreparationsFemaleHumansMaleMelatoninOutcome Assessment, Health CareSleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders
Study Links
Quality Scores
Safety85
Efficacy90/10
Quality92/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations147
Citations/Year18.4
Relative Citation Ratio7.60
NIH Percentile96.5%
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.95
Weight Score2.50
Normalized Score0.88
Related Supplements