Tactile massage reduces rescue doses for pain and anxiety: an observational study.
Study Goal
The researchers aimed to evaluate the effect of tactile massage (TM) on pain, anxiety, and well-being in palliative care patients.
Results Summary
TM significantly improved self-assessed pain, anxiety, and well-being, and reduced the need for rescue doses for pain and anxiety. The effects were evident after the first treatment and did not increase with repeated treatments, with no reported harmful effects.
Population
Palliative care patients in a hospice ward in Sweden.
Effective Dosage
Average of three treatments per patient (frequency not specified).
Duration
Not explicitly stated, but effects were monitored 24 hours before and after each treatment.
Interactions
None mentioned
| Intervention | Direction | Endpoint | Population | Dosage | Impact | Claim # |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
tactile massage (TM) | decrease | self-assessed pain | palliative care patients | 1.7 points (SD 1.6) | resulted in improvement of | #1 |
tactile massage (TM) | decrease | anxiety | palliative care patients | 2.3 points (SD 2.0) | resulted in improvement of | #2 |
tactile massage (TM) | increase | well-being | palliative care patients | 2.6 points (SD 1.4) | resulted in improvement of | #3 |
tactile massage (TM) | decrease | number of rescue doses for pain | palliative care patients | from 1.6 to 0.84 doses/patient (P<0.001) | reduced | #4 |
tactile massage (TM) | decrease | number of rescue doses for anxiety | palliative care patients | from 0.52 to 0.24 doses/patient (P<0.01) | reduced | #5 |
- | no change | number of rescue doses | the same patients in two consecutive days before the patients were offered TM | - | was not changed | #6 |
tactile massage (TM) | decrease | rescue doses for pain and anxiety | palliative care patients | - | reduced the need for administration of | #7 |
tactile massage (TM) | increase | well-being | palliative care patients | - | improved | #8 |
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of tactile massage (TM) on palliative care patients. METHOD: An observational study at a hospice ward in Sweden was carried out. Forty-one palliative patients were offered TM, at an average of three treatments per patient. Before and after every treatment, self-assessed pain, well-being and anxiety according to the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (0-10) were recorded. In addition, the number of rescue doses for pain and anxiety was monitored 24 hours before and after the treatment and in two consecutive days before the patients were offered TM (control data). RESULTS: TM resulted in improvement of self-assessed pain by 1.7 points (SD 1.6), anxiety by 2.3 points (SD 2.0) and well-being by 2.6 points (SD 1.4). The number of rescue doses for pain was reduced from 1.6 to 0.84 doses/patient (P<0.001) and for anxiety from 0.52 to 0.24 doses/patient (P<0.01). The number of rescue doses was not changed in the same patients in two consecutive days before the patients were offered TM. The effect was evident already after the first treatment and did not increase further with repeated treatments. No patients reported any harmful effects of the treatment. CONCLUSION: TM reduced the need for administration of rescue doses for pain and anxiety and improved well-being in palliative care patients. Larger randomised studies with parallel control groups are needed to confirm the findings from this observational pilot study.