Effects of Mindfulness-Based Art Therapy on Psychological Symptoms in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease.
Study Goal
The researchers aimed to evaluate the treatment effects of Mindfulness-Based Art Therapy (MBAT) on psychological stability in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients.
Results Summary
MBAT significantly improved depression, trait anxiety, anger control, and anger expression in CAD patients, with statistically significant interaction and group effects across multiple psychological measures.
Population
44 coronary artery disease (CAD) patients (21 in MBAT group, 23 in control group).
Effective Dosage
12 sessions of MBAT (specific duration per session not mentioned).
Duration
Duration of intervention not explicitly stated (implied by 12 sessions).
Interactions
None mentioned
| Intervention | Direction | Endpoint | Population | Dosage | Impact | Claim # |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mindfulness-based art therapy (MBAT) | increase | emotional relaxation | coronary artery disease (CAD) patients | - | induces | #1 |
Mindfulness-based art therapy (MBAT) | increase | psychological stability | coronary artery disease (CAD) patients | - | improves | #2 |
Mindfulness-based art therapy (MBAT) | decrease | depression | CAD patients | interaction effect, [F(1,36) = 23.15, P < 0.001]; between groups, [F(1,36) = 5.73, P = 0.022] | showed significant effects for groups, time, and interaction | #3 |
Mindfulness-based art therapy (MBAT) | decrease | trait anxiety | CAD patients | interaction effect, [F(1,36) = 13.23, P < 0.001]; between groups, [F(1,36) = 4.38, P = 0.043] | showed significant effects for groups, time, and interaction | #4 |
Mindfulness-based art therapy (MBAT) | decrease | state anger | CAD patients | interaction effect, [F(1,36) = 5.60, P = 0.023] | showed significant effects for groups, time, and interaction | #5 |
Mindfulness-based art therapy (MBAT) | decrease | trait anger | CAD patients | interaction effect, [F(1,36) = 6.93, P = 0.012]; within group, [F(1,36) = 4.73, P = 0.036] | showed significant effects for groups, time, and interaction | #6 |
Mindfulness-based art therapy (MBAT) | increase | anger control | CAD patients | interaction effect, [F(1,36) = 8.41, P = 0.006]; within group, [F(1,36) = 9.41, P = 0.004] | showed significant effects for groups, time, and interaction | #7 |
Mindfulness-based art therapy (MBAT) | decrease | anger out | CAD patients | interaction effect, [F(1,36) = 6.88, P = 0.012]; within group, [F(1,36) = 13.17, P < 0.001]; between groups, [F(1,36) = 5.62, P = 0.023] | showed significant effects for groups, time, and interaction | #8 |
Mindfulness-based art therapy (MBAT) | decrease | anger in | CAD patients | interaction effect, [F(1,36) = 32.66, P < 0.001]; within group, [F(1,36) = 25.90, P < 0.001]; between groups, [F(1,36) = 12.44, P < 0.001] | showed significant effects for groups, time, and interaction | #9 |
Mindfulness-based art therapy (MBAT) | increase | psychological stability | CAD patients | - | is an effective treatment method that improves | #10 |
BACKGROUND: Mindfulness-based art therapy (MBAT) induces emotional relaxation in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients, and is a treatment known to improve psychological stability. The objective of this study was to evaluate the treatment effects of MBAT for CAD patients. METHODS: A total of 44 CAD patients were selected as participants, 21 patients belonged to a MBAT group, and 23 patients belonged to the control group. The patients in the MBAT group were given 12 sessions of treatments. To measure depression and anxiety, Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and Trait Anxiety Inventory (TAI) were used. Anger and anger expression were evaluated using the State Trait Anger Expression Inventory (STAXI). The treatment results were analyzed using two-way repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA). RESULTS: The results showed that significant effects for groups, time, and interaction in the depression (interaction effect, [F(1,36) = 23.15, P < 0.001]; between groups, [F(1,36) = 5.73, P = 0.022]), trait anxiety (interaction effect, [F(1,36) = 13.23, P < 0.001]; between groups, [F(1,36) = 4.38, P = 0.043]), state anger (interaction effect, [F(1,36) = 5.60, P = 0.023]), trait anger (interaction effect, [F(1,36) = 6.93, P = 0.012]; within group, [F(1,36) = 4.73, P = 0.036]), anger control (interaction effect, [F(1,36) = 8.41, P = 0.006]; within group, [F(1,36) = 9.41, P = 0.004]), anger out (interaction effect, [F(1,36) = 6.88, P = 0.012]; within group, [F(1,36) = 13.17, P < 0.001]; between groups, [F(1,36) = 5.62, P = 0.023]), and anger in (interaction effect, [F(1,36) = 32.66, P < 0.001]; within group, [F(1,36) = 25.90, P < 0.001]; between groups, [F(1,36) = 12.44, P < 0.001]). CONCLUSION: MBAT can be seen as an effective treatment method that improves CAD patients' psychological stability. Evaluation of treatment effects using program development and large-scale research for future clinical application is needed.