Examination of Self-Myofascial Release vs. Instrument-Assisted Soft-Tissue Mobilization Techniques on Vertical and Horizontal Power in Recreational Athletes.
Study Goal
The researchers aimed to determine whether pre-exercise self-myofascial release (SMR) and instrument-assisted soft-tissue mobilization (IASTM) improved vertical jump height and 40-yd sprint performance, as well as differences in perceived pain levels.
Results Summary
SMR showed a significant improvement in vertical jump height but not in 40-yd sprint times. No significant differences in perceived pain were found between SMR and IASTM. Neither intervention enhanced sprinting performance.
Population
49 college students (recreational athletes)
Effective Dosage
Not specified
Duration
Single pre-exercise session
Interactions
None mentioned
| Intervention | Direction | Endpoint | Population | Dosage | Impact | Claim # |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
self-myofascial release (SMR) | increase | vertical jump height | recreational athletes | - | may improve | #1 |
self-myofascial release (SMR) | increase | vertical jump | college students | - | had a significant main effect for | #2 |
instrument-assisted soft-tissue mobilization (IASTM) | no change | perceived pain | athletes | - | was not perceived to be more painful than | #3 |
self-myofascial release (SMR) | no change | sprinting performance | - | - | did not enhance | #4 |
instrument-assisted soft-tissue mobilization (IASTM) | no change | sprinting performance | - | - | did not enhance | #5 |
massage interventions | no change | 40-yd sprint times | - | - | had no significant differences for | #6 |
massage interventions | no change | perceived pain | - | - | had no significant differences in | #7 |
Stroiney, DA, Mokris, RL, Hanna, GR, and Ranney, JD. Examination of self-myofascial release vs. instrument-assisted soft-tissue mobilization techniques on vertical and horizontal power in recreational athletes. J Strength Cond Res 34(1): 79-88, 2020-This study examined whether pre-exercise self-myofascial release (SMR) and instrument-assisted soft-tissue mobilization (IASTM) would improve performance on measures of vertical jump height and 40-yd sprint time. Differences in perceived pain levels were also examined. Forty-nine college students volunteered for the study and were randomly assigned to receive either IASTM via Tècnica Gavilàn PTB or SMR via The Stick before performance assessments. After the massage intervention, subjects rated their level of perceived pain using a visual analog scale. An independent t test was used to analyze differences in perceived pain levels between the 2 massage interventions. A 2 × 2 analyses of covariance analyzed differences between sex and the 2 massage interventions. There was no interaction (p > 0.05) between the massage intervention and sex for both the vertical jump and 40-yd sprint tests. There was a significant main effect for vertical jump and SMR (p = 0.04). Sex also had a significant main effect for both the vertical jump (p = 0.04) and the 40-yd sprint (p = 0.02). There were no significant differences between massage interventions for the 40-yd sprint times (p = 0.73). There were no significant differences in perceived pain (t(49) = -1.60, p > 0.05). The use of SMR before exercise may improve vertical jump height in recreational athletes. Pain should not be a factor when choosing massage interventions for athletes because IASTM was not perceived to be more painful than SMR. Self-myofascial release and IASTM did not enhance sprinting performance in this study.