Effects of Dietary Intervention on Gut Microbiota and Metabolic-Nutritional Profile of Outpatients with Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis: a Randomized Clinical Trial.
Study Goal
The researchers aimed to compare the impact of dietary intervention plus nutritional orientation versus nutritional orientation alone on gut microbiota and metabolic-nutritional profiles in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, including effects on alanine aminotransferase levels.
Results Summary
The DIET group showed significant reductions in alanine aminotransferase levels (p<0.001) and other metabolic markers, suggesting dietary modifications improve liver health. No significant changes were observed in the control group.
Population
40 outpatients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (mean age 49.48 ± 10.3 years).
Effective Dosage
Not specified for alanine; overall diet composition was 1,651.34 ± 263.25 kcal, 25% proteins.
Duration
3 months.
Interactions
None mentioned.
| Intervention | Direction | Endpoint | Population | Dosage | Impact | Claim # |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
diet (1.651.34 ± 263.25 kcal; 47% carbohydrates, 28% lipids, 25% proteins, 30 g fibers) and nutritional orientation | decrease | body weight | outpatients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis | p<0.001 | presented a reduction | #1 |
diet (1.651.34 ± 263.25 kcal; 47% carbohydrates, 28% lipids, 25% proteins, 30 g fibers) and nutritional orientation | decrease | BMI | outpatients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis | p<0.001 | presented a reduction | #2 |
diet (1.651.34 ± 263.25 kcal; 47% carbohydrates, 28% lipids, 25% proteins, 30 g fibers) and nutritional orientation | decrease | waist circumference | outpatients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis | p=0.001 | presented a reduction | #3 |
diet (1.651.34 ± 263.25 kcal; 47% carbohydrates, 28% lipids, 25% proteins, 30 g fibers) and nutritional orientation | decrease | percentage of fat | outpatients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis | p=0.002 | presented a reduction | #4 |
diet (1.651.34 ± 263.25 kcal; 47% carbohydrates, 28% lipids, 25% proteins, 30 g fibers) and nutritional orientation | decrease | serum aspartate aminotransferase | outpatients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis | p<0.001 | presented a reduction | #5 |
diet (1.651.34 ± 263.25 kcal; 47% carbohydrates, 28% lipids, 25% proteins, 30 g fibers) and nutritional orientation | decrease | alanine aminotransferase | outpatients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis | p<0.001 | presented a reduction | #6 |
diet (1.651.34 ± 263.25 kcal; 47% carbohydrates, 28% lipids, 25% proteins, 30 g fibers) and nutritional orientation | decrease | γ-glutamyltransferase | outpatients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis | p=0.001 | presented a reduction | #7 |
diet (1.651.34 ± 263.25 kcal; 47% carbohydrates, 28% lipids, 25% proteins, 30 g fibers) and nutritional orientation | decrease | glycemia | outpatients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis | p=0.003 | presented a reduction | #8 |
diet (1.651.34 ± 263.25 kcal; 47% carbohydrates, 28% lipids, 25% proteins, 30 g fibers) and nutritional orientation | decrease | homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance | outpatients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis | p=0.017 | presented a reduction | #9 |
diet (1.651.34 ± 263.25 kcal; 47% carbohydrates, 28% lipids, 25% proteins, 30 g fibers) and nutritional orientation | decrease | total cholesterol | outpatients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis | p=0.014 | presented a reduction | #10 |
diet (1.651.34 ± 263.25 kcal; 47% carbohydrates, 28% lipids, 25% proteins, 30 g fibers) and nutritional orientation | decrease | triacylglycerols | outpatients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis | p=0.008 | presented a reduction | #11 |
only nutritional orientation | no change | body weight, BMI, waist circumference, percentage of fat, serum aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, γ-glutamyltransferase, glycemia, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance, total cholesterol, and triacylglycerols | outpatients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis | - | did not present changes | #12 |
diet (1.651.34 ± 263.25 kcal; 47% carbohydrates, 28% lipids, 25% proteins, 30 g fibers) and nutritional orientation | increase | density of total microorganisms | outpatients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis | 3.76 ± 7.17 x 10 8 cells g -1 ; p=0.048 | an increase was detected | #13 |
only nutritional orientation | decrease | Bacteroidetes | outpatients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis | -0.77 ± 2.01 x 10 8 cells g -1 , p=0.044 | reduced | #14 |
only nutritional orientation | decrease | Verrucomicrobiales | outpatients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis | -0.46 ± 0.75 x 10 8 cells g -1 ; p=0.022 | reduced | #15 |
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Modulation of the gut microbiota emerges as a therapeutic possibility to improve health. Our objective was to compare the impact of three months of intervention with diet plus nutritional orientation versus only nutritional orientation on the gut microbiota and metabolic-nutritional profile of outpatients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. METHODS: It was a randomized clinical trial with 40 outpatients (49.48 ± 10.3 years), allocated in two groups: DIET group (n=20), who received diet (1.651.34 ± 263.25 kcal; 47% carbohydrates, 28% lipids, 25% proteins, 30 g fibers) and nutritional orientation, and control group (n = 20), which received only nutritional orientation. RESULTS: The DIET group, in relation to baseline, presented a reduction in body weight (p<0.001), BMI (p<0.001), waist circumference (p=0.001), percentage of fat (p=0.002), serum aspartate aminotransferase (p<0.001), alanine aminotransferase (p<0.001), γ-glutamyltransferase (p=0.001), glycemia (p=0.003), homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (p=0.017), total cholesterol (p=0.014), and triacylglycerols (p=0.008), whereas the control group did not present changes. After intervention, the small intestinal bacterial overgrowth frequency was 30% in the DIET group and 45% in the control group (p=0.327). In the DIET group, an increase in the density of total microorganisms (3.76 ± 7.17 x 10 8 cells g -1 ; p=0.048) was detected, while in the control group reduced Bacteroidetes (-0.77 ± 2.01 x 10 8 cells g -1 , p=0.044) and Verrucomicrobiales (-0.46 ± 0.75 x 10 8 cells g -1 ; p=0.022) were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that exclusively dietary modifications contribute to health promotion in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis and should be the basis of nutritional treatment for this condition.