Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Effectiveness of deep tissue massage therapy, and supervised strengthening and stretching exercises for subacute or persistent disabling neck pain. The Stockholm Neck (STONE) randomized controlled trial.

Musculoskeletal science & practice
February 1, 2020
Eva Skillgate et al. (7 authors)
Comparative StudyJournal ArticleRandomized Controlled TrialHuman StudyClinical
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to compare the effectiveness of deep tissue massage, supervised strengthening and stretching exercises, and a combined therapy (exercise followed by massage) against advice to stay active for adults with subacute or persistent neck pain.

Results Summary

Massage and combined therapy showed short-term improvements in pain intensity compared to advice, but no long-term benefits were observed. Perceived recovery was higher in the massage and combined therapy groups at all follow-ups, but no consistent differences were found in pain-related disability or sickness absence.

Population

619 adults with subacute or persistent neck pain.

Effective Dosage

Not specified

Duration

Outcomes measured at 7, 12, 26, and 52 weeks.

Interactions

None mentioned

Extracted Claims (12)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
deep tissue massage
decrease
pain intensity
adults with subacute or persistent neck pain
RR = 1.36; 95%CI:1.04-1.77
improvement in pain intensity favouring massage compared to advice
#1
deep tissue massage
decrease
pain intensity
adults with subacute or persistent neck pain
RR = 1.23; 95%CI:0.97-1.56
improvement in pain intensity favouring massage compared to advice
#2
combined therapy (exercise followed by massage)
decrease
pain intensity
adults with subacute or persistent neck pain
RR = 1.39; 95%CI:1.08-1.81
improvement in pain intensity favouring combined therapy compared to advice
#3
combined therapy (exercise followed by massage)
decrease
pain intensity
adults with subacute or persistent neck pain
RR = 1.28; 95%CI:1.02-1.60
improvement in pain intensity favouring combined therapy compared to advice
#4
supervised strengthening and stretching exercises
decrease
pain intensity
adults with subacute or persistent neck pain
RR = 1.31; 95%CI:1.04-1.65
higher improvement of pain intensity
#5
deep tissue massage, supervised strengthening and stretching exercises, and a combined therapy (exercise followed by massage)
increase
perceived recovery
adults with subacute or persistent neck pain
-
perceived recovery was higher in the index groups than in the advice group
#6
deep tissue massage, supervised strengthening and stretching exercises, and a combined therapy (exercise followed by massage)
no change
pain related disability
adults with subacute or persistent neck pain
-
no consistent differences
#7
deep tissue massage, supervised strengthening and stretching exercises, and a combined therapy (exercise followed by massage)
no change
sickness absence
adults with subacute or persistent neck pain
-
no consistent differences
#8
deep tissue massage, supervised strengthening and stretching exercises, and a combined therapy (exercise followed by massage)
no change
pain intensity
adults with subacute or persistent neck pain
-
none of the index therapies were more effective than advice
#9
deep tissue massage, supervised strengthening and stretching exercises, and a combined therapy (exercise followed by massage)
no change
pain-related disability
adults with subacute or persistent neck pain
-
none of the index therapies were more effective than advice
#10
deep tissue massage, supervised strengthening and stretching exercises, and a combined therapy (exercise followed by massage)
decrease
pain intensity
adults with subacute or persistent neck pain
-
led to higher incidence of improvement in pain intensity in the short term
#11
deep tissue massage, supervised strengthening and stretching exercises, and a combined therapy (exercise followed by massage)
increase
perceived recovery
adults with subacute or persistent neck pain
-
higher incidence of favorable perceived recovery in the short and in the long term than advice
#12
Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of deep tissue massage, supervised strengthening and stretching exercises, and a combined therapy (exercise followed by massage) (index groups), with advice to stay active (control group). METHODS: Randomized controlled trial of 619 adults with subacute or persistent neck pain allocated to massage (n = 145), exercise (n = 160), combined therapy (n = 169) or advice (n = 147). Primary outcomes were minimal clinically important improvements in neck pain intensity and pain-related disability based on adapted questions from the Chronic Pain Questionnaire. Secondary outcomes were perceived recovery and sickness absence. Outcomes were measured at seven, 12, 26 and 52 weeks. RESULTS: We found improvement in pain intensity favouring massage and combined therapy compared to advice; at seven weeks (RR = 1.36; 95%CI:1.04-1.77) and 26 weeks (RR = 1.23; 95%CI:0.97-1.56); and seven (RR = 1.39; 95%CI:1.08-1.81) and 12 weeks (RR = 1.28; 95%CI:1.02-1.60) respectively, but not at later follow-ups. Exercise showed higher improvement of pain intensity at 26 weeks (RR = 1.31; 95%CI:1.04-1.65). Perceived recovery was higher in the index groups than in the advice group at all follow-ups. We found no consistent differences in pain related disability or sickness absence. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, at 12-months follow-up, none of the index therapies were more effective than advice in terms of pain intensity in the long term or in terms of pain-related disability in the short or long term. However, the index therapies led to higher incidence of improvement in pain intensity in the short term, and higher incidence of favorable perceived recovery in the short and in the long term than advice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN01453590. Registered 3 July 2014.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
AdultAgedAged, 80 and overChronic PainExercise TherapyFemaleHumansMaleMassageMiddle AgedNeck PainPractice Guidelines as TopicSurveys and QuestionnairesSwedenTreatment Outcome
Study Links
Quality Scores
SafetyNot Assessed
Efficacy70/10
Quality85/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations18
Citations/Year3.6
Relative Citation Ratio2.19
NIH Percentile77.2%
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.75
Weight Score2.50
Normalized Score0.65
Related Supplements