Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Mouthwash With Alcohol and Oral Carcinogenesis: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

The journal of evidence-based dental practice
June 1, 2020
Ricard Aceves Argemí et al. (5 authors)
Journal ArticleMeta-AnalysisSystematic ReviewHuman Study
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to assess the possible relationship between the use of mouthwashes containing alcohol and the development of oral and pharyngeal cancers through a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Results Summary

The study found mixed evidence, with 8 case-control studies showing a statistically significant link between alcohol-containing mouthwash and oral cancer, while 3 case-control studies and 3 clinical trials observed no significant evidence or noted potential risks due to alcohol's genotoxicity. The meta-analysis did not provide conclusive evidence to support a definitive relationship.

Population

Not specified (general population inferred from literature review).

Effective Dosage

Not specified.

Duration

Not specified.

Interactions

None mentioned.

Extracted Claims (8)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
mouthwashes with alcohol
increase
risk of oral cancer
-
-
increased risk of oral cancer
#1
mouthwash use
no change
oral cancer
-
-
no statistically significant evidence
#2
mouthwash use
increase
oral cancer
-
-
statistically significant evidence
#3
mouthwashes with alcohol
increase
cancer
-
-
relationship with possibility of developing cancer
#4
mouthwashes with alcohol
increase
oral tissues and mucous membranes
-
-
genotoxicity and mutagenic capacity
#5
mouthwashes with alcohol
increase
cancer risk
-
OR = 1.480
OR = 1.480
#6
mouthwash use without taking into account the presence of alcohol
increase
risk of cancer
-
OR = 1.057
OR = 1.057
#7
mouthwashes containing alcohol
no change
development of oral cancer
-
-
no sufficient evidence to accept the proposition
#8
Abstract

BACKGROUND: It has been shown that the risk of developing oral cancer is closely related to the intensity and duration of exposure to alcohol and tobacco. Even so, the use of mouthwashes with alcohol in their compositions and the increased risk of oral cancer has been a source of controversy for decades. OBJECTIVE: This study proposes a systematic review and a meta-analysis of the literature, to assess the possible relationship between the use of mouthwashes with alcohol and the development of oral and pharyngeal cancers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic search was done using the Medline and PubMed databases. Exclusion criteria were as follows: articles published in languages other than English or Spanish, systematic reviews, and expert opinions. No limitations were used for publication date. RESULTS: A total of 14 articles were obtained, 11 case-control studies and 3 clinical trials. Three case-control studies found no statistically significant evidence between the relationship of mouthwash use and oral cancer and the remaining 8 case-control studies found statistically significant evidence. The 3 clinical trials observed a relationship between the use of mouthwashes with alcohol and the possibility of developing cancer due to the genotoxicity and mutagenic capacity of alcohol in chronic contact with oral tissues and mucous membranes. The meta-analysis resulted in an OR = 1.480 and a P-value = .161 (95% CI: 0.855; P-value = 2.561) for the analysis of studies of cancer risk and consumption of mouthwashes with alcohol and OR = 1.057 0.364 (95% CI: 0.951; P-value = 1.174) for studies that related the risk of cancer and mouthwash use without taking into account the presence of alcohol. CONCLUSIONS: There is no sufficient evidence to accept the proposition that the use of mouthwashes containing alcohol can influence the development of oral cancer.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
CarcinogenesisCase-Control StudiesHumansMouth NeoplasmsMouthwashes
Study Links
Quality Scores
Safety65
Efficacy50/10
Quality75/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations16
Citations/Year3.2
Relative Citation Ratio1.56
NIH Percentile66.5%
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.75
Weight Score2.30
Normalized Score0.61
Related Supplements