Effects of macronutrient intake in obesity: a meta-analysis of low-carbohydrate and low-fat diets on markers of the metabolic syndrome.
Study Goal
The researchers aimed to determine the extent to which weight loss, caloric intake reduction, or macronutrient changes (specifically low-carbohydrate vs. low-fat diets) improve markers of metabolic syndrome in obese individuals without cardiometabolic disease.
Results Summary
Both low-carbohydrate and low-fat diets led to weight loss and improved metabolic syndrome markers. Weight loss most effectively reduced fasting glucose, while actual carbohydrate and fat intake improved diastolic blood pressure and triglyceride levels, independent of caloric intake changes.
Population
Obese individuals without cardiometabolic disease
Effective Dosage
<40% energy from carbohydrates (low-carbohydrate diet), <30% energy from fat (low-fat diet)
Duration
Not specified
Interactions
None mentioned
| Intervention | Direction | Endpoint | Population | Dosage | Impact | Claim # |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
low-carbohydrate (LC) diet | decrease | weight loss | persons with obesity | - | could lead to | #1 |
low-fat (LF) diet | decrease | weight loss | persons with obesity | - | could lead to | #2 |
low-carbohydrate (LC) diet | improve | markers of MetS | persons with obesity | - | improve | #3 |
low-fat (LF) diet | improve | markers of MetS | persons with obesity | - | improve | #4 |
weight loss | decrease | fasting glucose levels | persons with obesity | - | most efficaciously reduced | #5 |
actual carbohydrate intake at the end of the study | improve | diastolic blood pressure | persons with obesity | - | improved | #6 |
actual fat intake at the end of the study | improve | diastolic blood pressure | persons with obesity | - | improved | #7 |
actual carbohydrate intake at the end of the study | improve | circulating triglyceride levels | persons with obesity | - | improved | #8 |
actual fat intake at the end of the study | improve | circulating triglyceride levels | persons with obesity | - | improved | #9 |
low-carbohydrate (LC) diet | improve | homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance | persons with obesity | - | improved | #10 |
low-fat (LF) diet | improve | homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance | persons with obesity | - | improved | #11 |
low-carbohydrate (LC) diet | increase | high-density lipoprotein cholesterol | persons with obesity | - | only improved | #12 |
changes in caloric intake | no change | MetS markers | persons with obesity | - | did not play a primary role in altering | #13 |
The metabolic syndrome (MetS) comprises cardiometabolic risk factors frequently found in individuals with obesity. Guidelines to prevent or reverse MetS suggest limiting fat intake, however, lowering carbohydrate intake has gained attention too. The aim for this review was to determine to what extent either weight loss, reduction in caloric intake, or changes in macronutrient intake contribute to improvement in markers of MetS in persons with obesity without cardiometabolic disease. A meta-analysis was performed across a spectrum of studies applying low-carbohydrate (LC) and low-fat (LF) diets. PubMed searches yielded 17 articles describing 12 separate intervention studies assessing changes in MetS markers of persons with obesity assigned to LC (<40% energy from carbohydrates) or LF (<30% energy from fat) diets. Both diets could lead to weight loss and improve markers of MetS. Meta-regression revealed that weight loss most efficaciously reduced fasting glucose levels independent of macronutrient intake at the end of the study. Actual carbohydrate intake and actual fat intake at the end of the study, but not the percent changes in intake of these macronutrients, improved diastolic blood pressure and circulating triglyceride levels, without an effect of weight loss. The homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance improved with both diets, whereas high-density lipoprotein cholesterol only improved in the LC diet, both irrespective of aforementioned factors. Remarkably, changes in caloric intake did not play a primary role in altering MetS markers. Taken together, these data suggest that, beyond the general effects of the LC and LF diet categories to improve MetS markers, there are also specific roles for weight loss, LC and HF intake, but not reduced caloric intake, that improve markers of MetS irrespective of diet categorization. On the basis of the results from this meta-analysis, guidelines to prevent MetS may need to be re-evaluated.