Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

StudiCare mindfulness-study protocol of a randomized controlled trial evaluating an internet- and mobile-based intervention for college students with no and "on demand" guidance.

Trials
January 1, 1970
Ann-Marie Küchler et al. (6 authors)
Clinical Trial ProtocolJournal ArticleHuman StudyClinical
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to evaluate the efficacy of an internet- and mobile-based mindfulness intervention (StudiCare-M) for college students, comparing unguided and "guidance on demand" conditions to a waitlist control, and to examine moderators and mediators of its effects.

Results Summary

The study assessed mindfulness as the primary outcome, with secondary outcomes including stress, depression, anxiety, and wellbeing, but specific results were not detailed in the abstract. The trial design suggests potential efficacy, pending full analysis.

Population

College students with moderate to low mindfulness from 15+ universities in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland.

Effective Dosage

7 modules plus 2 booster sessions (specific frequency not detailed).

Duration

Follow-up assessments at 1, 2, and 6 months post-randomization.

Interactions

None mentioned

Extracted Claims (14)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
StudiCare Mindfulness (StudiCare-M)
increase
mindfulness
college students with moderate to low mindfulness
-
evaluate the efficacy
#1
StudiCare Mindfulness (StudiCare-M)
neutral
mindfulness
college students with moderate to low mindfulness
-
examine potential moderators and mediators
#2
StudiCare Mindfulness (StudiCare-M)
neutral
mindfulness
college students with moderate to low mindfulness
-
compared to a waitlist control group
#3
StudiCare Mindfulness (StudiCare-M)
neutral
stress
college students with moderate to low mindfulness
-
assessments take place
#4
StudiCare Mindfulness (StudiCare-M)
neutral
depression
college students with moderate to low mindfulness
-
assessments take place
#5
StudiCare Mindfulness (StudiCare-M)
neutral
anxiety
college students with moderate to low mindfulness
-
assessments take place
#6
StudiCare Mindfulness (StudiCare-M)
neutral
interoception
college students with moderate to low mindfulness
-
assessments take place
#7
StudiCare Mindfulness (StudiCare-M)
neutral
presenteeism
college students with moderate to low mindfulness
-
assessments take place
#8
StudiCare Mindfulness (StudiCare-M)
neutral
wellbeing
college students with moderate to low mindfulness
-
assessments take place
#9
StudiCare Mindfulness (StudiCare-M)
neutral
intervention satisfaction
college students with moderate to low mindfulness
-
assessments take place
#10
StudiCare Mindfulness (StudiCare-M)
neutral
adherence
college students with moderate to low mindfulness
-
assessments take place
#11
StudiCare Mindfulness (StudiCare-M)
neutral
potential side effects
college students with moderate to low mindfulness
-
assessments take place
#12
StudiCare Mindfulness (StudiCare-M)
increase
health and functionality of future society
college students
-
help college students become more resilient
#13
StudiCare Mindfulness (StudiCare-M)
increase
college student mental health
college students
-
offers a low-threshold potentially resource-efficient possibility to enhance
#14
Abstract

BACKGROUND: College is an exciting but also challenging time with an increased risk for mental health issues. Only a minority of the college students concerned get professional help, a problem that might be improvable by internet- and mobile-based interventions (IMIs). However, adherence of IMIs is a concern. While guidance might be a solution, it is resource-intensive, derailing potential implementation on population level. The first aim of this trial is to evaluate the efficacy of the IMI StudiCare Mindfulness (StudiCare-M) for college students with "on demand" and no guidance. The second aim is to examine potential moderators and mediators, contributing to the questions of "how" and "for whom" such interventions work. METHODS: In this three-armed randomized controlled trial, both an unguided and "guidance on demand" (GoD) condition of StudiCare-M are compared to a waitlist control group. StudiCare-M is based on principles of acceptance and commitment therapy and stress management and consists of 7 modules plus two booster sessions. Participants in the GoD condition may ask their e-coach for support whenever needed. A total of 387 college students with moderate to low mindfulness are recruited at 15+ cooperating universities in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland via circular emails. Assessments take place before as well as 1, 2, and 6 months after randomization. The primary outcome is mindfulness. Secondary outcomes include stress, depression, anxiety, interoception, presenteeism, wellbeing, intervention satisfaction, adherence, and potential side effects. Among examined moderators and mediators are sociodemographic variables, pre-treatment symptomatology, treatment expectancy, self-efficacy, cognitive fusion, emotion regulation, and alexithymia. All data will be analyzed according to intention-to-treat (ITT) principles. DISCUSSION: Providing effective interventions to help college students become more resilient can make a valuable contribution to the health and functionality of future society. If effective under the condition of minimal or no guidance, StudiCare-M offers a low-threshold potentially resource-efficient possibility to enhance college student mental health on a population level. Moderation- and mediation analyses will deliver further insights for optimization of target groups and intervention content. TRIAL REGISTRATION: WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform via the German Clinical Studies Trial Register DRKS00014774 . Registered on 18 May 2018.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
Acceptance and Commitment TherapyAustriaGermanyHumansInternetMindfulnessRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicStudentsSwitzerlandUniversities
Study Links
Quality Scores
SafetyNot Assessed
Efficacy75/10
Quality85/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations7
Citations/Year1.4
Relative Citation Ratio0.74
NIH Percentile39.4%
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.25
Weight Score1.67
Normalized Score0.67
Related Supplements