Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Efficacy and safety of non-pharmacological interventions for labour pain management: A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis.

Journal of clinical nursing
December 1, 2021
Yinchu Hu et al. (4 authors)
Journal ArticleMeta-AnalysisReviewSystematic ReviewHuman Study
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to compare and rank the efficacy and safety of non-pharmacological interventions, including massage therapy, for managing labor pain.

Results Summary

The study found that massage therapy (SMD = -1.26, 95% CrI -2.26 to -0.30) had significant positive effects on alleviating labor pain, though it was less effective than aromatherapy and acupressure. No significant differences were noted between non-pharmacological interventions and usual care regarding pharmacological method use or neonatal outcomes.

Population

Low-risk pregnant women

Effective Dosage

Not available

Duration

Not specified

Interactions

None mentioned

Extracted Claims (7)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
acupressure
decrease
labour pain
low-risk pregnant women
SMD = -2.00, 95% CrI -3.09 to -0.94
had significant positive effects on alleviating
#1
aromatherapy
decrease
labour pain
low-risk pregnant women
SMD = -2.01, 95% CrI -3.70 to -0.35
had significant positive effects on alleviating
#2
massage therapy
decrease
labour pain
low-risk pregnant women
SMD = -1.26, 95% CrI -2.26 to -0.30
had significant positive effects on alleviating
#3
yoga
decrease
the first stage of labour
low-risk pregnant women
SMD = -130.85, 95% CrI -212.01 to -59.32
was the most effective intervention for shortening
#4
acupressure
decrease
the second stage of labour
low-risk pregnant women
SMD = -10.14, 95% CrI -20.24 to -0.41
was the most effective intervention for shortening
#5
non-pharmacological interventions
no change
use of pharmacological methods
low-risk pregnant women
-
no significant differences
#6
non-pharmacological interventions
no change
neonatal 5-min Apgar score
low-risk pregnant women
-
no significant differences
#7
Abstract

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To compare and rank the efficacy and safety of non-pharmacological interventions in the management of labour pain. BACKGROUND: Recently, various non-pharmacological interventions have been applied to manage labour pain and have shown positive effects. However, evidence identifying which type of non-pharmacological intervention is more efficient and safer is limited. DESIGN: Systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis based on PRISMA-NMA. METHODS: Seven databases were searched from database inception-March 2020. Two reviewers independently performed study selection, quality appraisal and data extraction. Conventional meta-analysis was conducted using either fixed-effects model or random-effects model according to statistical heterogeneity. The Bayesian network meta-analysis was conducted using the consistency model. RESULTS: 43 studies involving nine non-pharmacological interventions were included. The Bayesian network meta-analysis showed that acupressure (SMD = -2.00, 95% CrI -3.09 to -0.94), aromatherapy (SMD = -2.01, 95% CrI -3.70 to -0.35) and massage therapy (SMD = -1.26, 95% CrI -2.26 to -0.30) had significant positive effects on alleviating labour pain, with aromatherapy being the most effective. The results also revealed that yoga (SMD = -130.85, 95% CrI -212.01 to -59.32) and acupressure (SMD = -10.14, 95% CrI -20.24 to -0.41) were the most effective interventions for shortening the first stage and the second stage of labour, respectively. There were no significant differences between non-pharmacological interventions and usual care or placebo control on the use of pharmacological methods and neonatal 5-min Apgar score. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence in this network meta-analysis illustrates that non-pharmacological interventions are effective and safe for labour pain management in low-risk pregnant women. In the future, well-designed studies are needed to validate the conclusion of this network meta-analysis. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: The results support the use of non-pharmacological interventions, especially aromatherapy and acupressure, to relieve labour pain in low-risk pregnant women. Non-pharmacological interventions for labour pain management are recommended to apply according to maternal women's preference and values.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
AcupressureAnalgesicsBayes TheoremFemaleHumansLabor PainNetwork Meta-AnalysisPregnancy
Study Links
Quality Scores
SafetyNot Assessed
Efficacy75/10
Quality85/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations20
Citations/Year5.0
Relative Citation Ratio2.47
NIH Percentile80.4%
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.75
Weight Score2.70
Normalized Score0.67
Related Supplements
Efficacy and safety of non-pharmacological interventions for... | Panacea Index