Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

A systematic review of non-drug interventions to prevent and treat anxiety in people with aphasia after stroke.

Disability and rehabilitation
September 1, 2022
Brooke J Ryan et al. (6 authors)
Journal ArticleSystematic ReviewResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tHuman Study
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to investigate the effectiveness of non-drug interventions, including mindfulness meditation, for preventing or treating anxiety in people with aphasia post-stroke.

Results Summary

The study found no definitive evidence of benefit from mindfulness meditation for anxiety outcomes in people with aphasia post-stroke, though it was identified as a potentially promising intervention alongside other non-drug approaches. The quality of evidence supporting mindfulness was limited, with higher-quality studies showing no significant effects.

Population

People with aphasia post-stroke (≥25% of study participants).

Effective Dosage

Not specified

Duration

Not specified

Interactions

None mentioned

Extracted Claims (5)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
non-drug interventions
no change
anxiety outcomes
people with aphasia post-stroke
no significant change
none demonstrated a benefit
#1
mindfulness meditation
decrease
symptoms of anxiety
people with aphasia post-stroke
-
may show promise
#2
modified cognitive behaviour therapy
decrease
symptoms of anxiety
people with aphasia post-stroke
-
may show promise
#3
unilateral nostril breathing
decrease
symptoms of anxiety
people with aphasia post-stroke
-
may show promise
#4
"Enhance Psychological Coping after Stroke" programme
decrease
symptoms of anxiety
people with aphasia post-stroke
-
may show promise
#5
Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the effectiveness of non-drug interventions for people with aphasia in the prevention and/or treatment of anxiety post-stroke as either a primary or secondary outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic search of Medline, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Cochrane Library up to March 2021 was carried out. Studies of stroke populations were included if people with aphasia represented 25% or more of the enrolled participants. Quality of the evidence was assessed. A narrative synthesis of results is presented. The PROSPERO record ID for this study is 106451. RESULTS: Ten studies were included: five randomised controlled trials (RCTs), a single case experimental design, and four pre-post studies. The quality of the RCT trials was at least adequate but none demonstrated a benefit to anxiety outcomes. Those studies that reported benefit were of lower-level evidence with respect to National Health and Medical Research Classifications. No studies were found that evaluated the prevention of anxiety after stroke for people with aphasia. CONCLUSION: Definitive conclusions about the effectiveness of non-drug interventions for the prevention and/or treatment of anxiety in people with aphasia post-stroke cannot be made. Interventions that may show promise for those with aphasia and symptoms of anxiety include mindfulness meditation, modified cognitive behaviour therapy, unilateral nostril breathing, and the "Enhance Psychological Coping after Stroke" programme. Further high-quality research with better reporting of the inclusion of participants with aphasia and their specific sub-group results are required.Implications for RehabilitationIt is important for rehabilitation professionals to consider prevention of anxiety post-stroke as well as treatment.Mindfulness meditation, modified cognitive behavioural therapy, unilateral nostril breathing, and the and the "Enhance Psychological Coping after Stroke" programme may be of benefit to people with aphasia post-stroke.Adapting intervention protocols to be more communicatively accessible and training health professionals in supported communication may help people with aphasia engage in psychological therapies.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
AnxietyAnxiety DisordersAphasiaCognitive Behavioral TherapyHumansStroke
Study Links
Quality Scores
SafetyNot Assessed
Efficacy60/10
Quality70/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations13
Citations/Year4.3
Relative Citation Ratio3.01
NIH Percentile85.1%
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.75
Weight Score2.48
Normalized Score0.58
Related Supplements
A systematic review of non-drug interventions to prevent and... | Panacea Index