Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Take-Pause: Efficacy of mindfulness-based virtual reality as an intervention in the pediatric emergency department.

Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine
March 1, 2022
Mahlaqa Butt et al. (7 authors)
Journal ArticleRandomized Controlled TrialHuman StudyClinical
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a mindfulness-based virtual reality program (Take-Pause) in reducing anxiety in pediatric emergency department patients compared to passive distraction.

Results Summary

The VR group showed a significantly greater reduction in anxiety scores (10 points) compared to the iPad group (6 points), with no significant differences in pain scores or respiratory rates. No adverse effects were reported in either group.

Population

Pediatric emergency department patients aged 13-17 years with acute pain.

Effective Dosage

5 minutes of VR or iPad use.

Duration

5 minutes.

Interactions

None mentioned.

Extracted Claims (6)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
mindfulness-based virtual reality (VR) program (Take-Pause)
decrease
anxiety score
pediatric ED patients aged 13-17 years with acute pain
10 points
improved
#1
passive distraction intervention (iPad group)
decrease
anxiety score
pediatric ED patients aged 13-17 years with acute pain
6 points
improved
#2
mindfulness-based virtual reality (VR) program (Take-Pause)
no change
pain scores
pediatric ED patients aged 13-17 years with acute pain
-
no statistical significance in the reduction of
#3
passive distraction intervention (iPad group)
no change
pain scores
pediatric ED patients aged 13-17 years with acute pain
-
no statistical significance in the reduction of
#4
mindfulness-based virtual reality (VR) program (Take-Pause)
no change
respiratory rates
pediatric ED patients aged 13-17 years with acute pain
-
no statistical significance in the reduction of
#5
passive distraction intervention (iPad group)
no change
respiratory rates
pediatric ED patients aged 13-17 years with acute pain
-
no statistical significance in the reduction of
#6
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Emergency department (ED) visits are known to be anxiety-ridden and stress-provoking experiences especially in the pediatric population. Distraction techniques have been used as a means to reduce anxiety and stress thereby facilitating care in the ED and making the visit less unpleasant. Our study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of an active and immersive distraction technique, using a mindfulness-based virtual reality (VR) program (Take-Pause), to alleviate anxiety in pediatric ED patients. METHODS: A prospective, randomized, single-blinded study, evaluating ED patients aged 13-17 years with a chief complaint of acute pain was conducted. Patients were randomized either to the active distraction intervention (VR group), utilizing the VR headset for 5 min, or to the passive distraction intervention (iPad group), playing on an iPad for 5 min. The primary outcome was a difference in the change in anxiety scores on the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory between the two groups. Secondary outcomes included a difference in pain scores, respiratory rate, and heart rate between the groups. RESULTS: A total of 110 subjects were enrolled. At 15 min, the mean anxiety score for the VR group improved by 10 points versus 6 points in the iPad group (p < 0.001; 95% confidence interval = 0.44 to 7.6). There was no statistical significance in the reduction of pain scores (p = 0.953) and respiratory rates (p = 0.776) between the groups. Patients enrolled in both groups did not experience any adverse effects. CONCLUSION: Take-Pause, offering an active and immersive distraction technique, is more effective than a passive distraction approach to lower anxiety levels in adolescent ED patients.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
Acute PainAdolescentAnxietyChildEmergency Service, HospitalHumansMindfulnessPain ManagementProspective StudiesVirtual Reality
Study Links
Quality Scores
Safety100
Efficacy85/10
Quality90/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations8
Citations/Year2.7
Relative Citation Ratio2.01
NIH Percentile74.7%
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.75
Weight Score2.80
Normalized Score0.92
Related Supplements