Positional release therapy and therapeutic massage reduce muscle trigger and tender points.
Study Goal
The researchers aimed to compare the effectiveness of therapeutic massage (TM) and positional release therapy (PRT) in treating trigger and tender points in the upper trapezius muscle.
Results Summary
Both TM and PRT effectively reduced pain and acutely decreased muscle stiffness, though PRT showed clinically better pain reduction and pressure sensitivity improvements. Neither treatment maintained reduced muscle stiffness in males after 48 hours.
Population
60 healthy participants (24 male, 36 female) with upper trapezius pain and trigger points, aged 27.1 ± 8.8 years.
Effective Dosage
Not specified
Duration
Measurements taken at baseline, post-treatment, and 48 hours later (intervention duration not explicitly stated).
Interactions
None mentioned
| Intervention | Direction | Endpoint | Population | Dosage | Impact | Claim # |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
positional release therapy (PRT) | decrease | pain | participants with upper trapezius pain and a trigger point | - | showed decreased pain averages | #1 |
positional release therapy (PRT) | decrease | pressure sensitivity | participants with upper trapezius pain and a trigger point | - | decreased pressure sensitivity | #2 |
therapeutic massage (TM) | decrease | pain | participants with upper trapezius pain and a trigger point | - | effective in treatment of pain | #3 |
therapeutic massage (TM) | decrease | muscle stiffness | participants with upper trapezius pain and a trigger point | - | effective in treatment of muscle stiffness | #4 |
positional release therapy (PRT) | decrease | pain | participants with upper trapezius pain and a trigger point | - | effective in treatment of pain | #5 |
positional release therapy (PRT) | decrease | muscle stiffness | participants with upper trapezius pain and a trigger point | - | effective in treatment of muscle stiffness | #6 |
therapeutic massage (TM) | no change | muscle stiffness | males | - | was not able to maintain the reduced muscle stiffness | #7 |
positional release therapy (PRT) | no change | muscle stiffness | males | - | was not able to maintain the reduced muscle stiffness | #8 |
positional release therapy (PRT) | decrease | pain | participants with upper trapezius pain and a trigger point | - | more effective at decreasing pain | #9 |
positional release therapy (PRT) | decrease | pressure sensitivity | participants with upper trapezius pain and a trigger point | - | more effective at decreasing pressure sensitivity | #10 |
therapeutic massage (TM) | no change | muscle stiffness | males | - | did not produce a long lasting effect on muscle stiffness | #11 |
positional release therapy (PRT) | no change | muscle stiffness | males | - | did not produce a long lasting effect on muscle stiffness | #12 |
OBJECTIVE: To determine if positional release therapy (PRT) or therapeutic massage (TM) was more effective in the treatment of trigger and tender points in the upper trapezius muscle. BACKGROUND: Trigger points in the upper trapezius muscle are common and can be painful. Trigger points are commonly treated using TM however, PRT is a novel treatment that deserves further investigation. METHODS: Sixty healthy male (24) and female (36) participants, (age = 27.1 ± 8.8 years, wt = 75.2 ± 17.9 kg, ht = 172.8 ± 9.7 cm) presenting with upper trapezius pain and a trigger point were recruited and randomized into either the TM or PRT group. Upper trapezius trigger points were found via palpation. Pain level was evaluated using a visual analog scale (VAS) and pain pressure threshold (PPT) was assessed using a pressure algometer. Muscle thickness was measured by B-mode ultrasound, while muscle stiffness was measured by shear-wave elastography (SWE). Participants were measured at baseline, posttreatment and again 48 h later. RESULTS: Both treatments were effective in treatment of pain and muscle stiffness. Although no statistical group differences existed, treatment using PRT showed decreased pain averages and decreased pressure sensitivity at both post treatment, and 48 h later. Neither treatment was able to maintain the reduced muscle stiffness at the 48-h measure in males. CONCLUSION: Both treatments showed a significant ability to reduce pain and acutely decrease muscle stiffness. Although not statistically different, clinically PRT is more effective at decreasing pain, and decreasing pressure sensitivity. Neither treatment method produced a long lasting effect on muscle stiffness in males.