Risk or benefit? Side effects of caffeine supplementation in sport: a systematic review.
| Intervention | Direction | Endpoint | Population | Dosage | Impact | Claim # |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
caffeine supplementation | increase | all side effects | athletes | - | produced a higher prevalence or magnitude of all side effects | #1 |
low doses of caffeine | increase | side effects | athletes | between 6 and 34% | prevalence | #2 |
low doses of caffeine | increase | side effects | athletes | ES between 0.13 and 1.11 | magnitude | #3 |
moderate doses of caffeine | increase | side effects | athletes | between 0 and 34% | prevalence | #4 |
moderate doses of caffeine | increase | side effects | athletes | ES between -0.13 and 1.20 | magnitude | #5 |
high doses of caffeine | increase | side effects | athletes | between 8 and 83% | prevalence | #6 |
high doses of caffeine | increase | side effects | athletes | ES between 0.04 and 1.52 | magnitude | #7 |
caffeine supplementation | increase | tachycardia/heart palpitations | athletes | - | had the highest prevalence and magnitude | #8 |
caffeine supplementation | increase | negative effects on sleep onset | athletes | - | had the highest prevalence and magnitude | #9 |
caffeine supplementation | increase | side effects | athletes | - | produces several side effects | #10 |
high doses of caffeine | increase | side effects | athletes | - | prevalence and magnitude of side effects were habitually higher | #11 |
~3.0 mg/kg of caffeine | decrease | side effects | athletes | - | may be the dose of choice to obtain the ergogenic benefits of caffeine with the lowest prevalence and magnitude | #12 |
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to systematically review evidence on the prevalence and magnitude of side effects associated with caffeine supplementation in athletes. METHODS: Systematic searches through the PubMed, VHL, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. Peer-reviewed articles written in English that reported the prevalence/percentage or magnitude/effect size of side effects after caffeine supplementation in athletes in a sports context were included. Studies were grouped by the dose of caffeine administered as follows: low = ≤ 3.0 mg/kg; moderate = from 3.1 to 6.0 mg/kg; high = ≥ 6.1 mg/kg. The magnitude of the side effects was calculated with effect sizes. RESULTS: The search retrieved 25 studies that met the inclusion/exclusion criteria with a pooled sample of 421 participants. The supplementation with caffeine produced a higher prevalence or magnitude of all side effects under investigation when compared to placebo/control situations. The prevalence (magnitude) was between 6 and 34% (ES between 0.13 and 1.11) for low doses of caffeine, between 0 and 34% (ES between -0.13 and 1.20) for moderate doses of caffeine, and between 8 and 83% (ES between 0.04 and 1.52) with high doses of caffeine. The presence of tachycardia/heart palpitations and the negative effects on sleep onset had the highest prevalence and magnitude, in athletes using supplementation with caffeine. CONCLUSION: In summary, caffeine supplementation in the doses habitually used to enhance physical performance produces several side effects, both after exercise and at least 24 h after the ingestion. However, the prevalence and magnitude of side effects with high doses of caffeine were habitually higher than with low doses of caffeine. From a practical perspective, using ~3.0 mg/kg of caffeine may be the dose of choice to obtain the ergogenic benefits of caffeine with the lowest prevalence and magnitude of side effects.