Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Elucidating treatment targets and mediators within a confirmatory efficacy trial: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial of cognitive-behavioral therapy vs. light therapy for winter depression.

Trials
January 1, 1970
Kelly J Rohan et al. (7 authors)
Clinical Trial ProtocolJournal ArticleHuman StudyClinical
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to confirm the efficacy, mechanisms, and biomarkers of Light Therapy (LT) for winter seasonal affective disorder (SAD) and compare its long-term outcomes with cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT-SAD).

Results Summary

The study found that LT and CBT-SAD had similar post-treatment outcomes, but CBT-SAD was associated with fewer depression recurrences two winters later. LT's efficacy was linked to circadian phase correction, while CBT-SAD's benefits were mediated by altering seasonal beliefs.

Population

Adults with winter seasonal affective disorder (SAD).

Effective Dosage

Not specified in the abstract.

Duration

6 weeks of initial treatment, with follow-ups in subsequent winters.

Interactions

None mentioned.

Extracted Claims (12)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
SAD-tailored group cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT-SAD)
decrease
depression recurrences
patients with winter seasonal affective disorder (SAD)
27.3% in CBT-SAD vs. 45.6% in LT
was associated with fewer depression recurrences
#1
light therapy (LT)
neutral
depression recurrences
patients with winter seasonal affective disorder (SAD)
45.6%
was associated with depression recurrences
#2
CBT-SAD
neutral
seasonal beliefs
patients with winter seasonal affective disorder (SAD)
-
engaged and altered
#3
CBT-SAD
neutral
acute antidepressant effects
patients with winter seasonal affective disorder (SAD)
-
mediated
#4
CBT-SAD
neutral
enduring benefit over LT
patients with winter seasonal affective disorder (SAD)
-
mediated
#5
light therapy (LT)
neutral
correction of circadian phase
-
-
assumed target and mechanism
#6
light therapy (LT)
neutral
circadian phase angle difference
-
-
biomarkers of target and effect include
#7
light therapy (LT)
neutral
post-illumination pupil response
-
-
biomarkers of target and effect include
#8
CBT-SAD
decrease
decreased pupillary responses to seasonal words
-
-
biomarkers of target and effect include
#9
CBT-SAD
decrease
decreased sustained frontal gamma-band EEG responses to seasonal words
-
-
biomarkers of target and effect include
#10
CBT-SAD
neutral
pupillary and sustained frontal gamma-band EEG responses to seasonal words
-
-
hypothesized as biomarkers of seasonal beliefs
#11
CBT-SAD
decrease
engagement with seasonal stimuli
-
-
reflecting less engagement with seasonal stimuli
#12
Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study is a confirmatory efficacy trial of two treatments for winter seasonal affective disorder (SAD): SAD-tailored group cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT-SAD) and light therapy (LT). In our previous efficacy trial, post-treatment outcomes for CBT-SAD and LT were very similar, but CBT-SAD was associated with fewer depression recurrences two winters later than LT (27.3% in CBT-SAD vs. 45.6% in LT). CBT-SAD engaged and altered a specific mechanism of action, seasonal beliefs, which mediated CBT-SAD's acute antidepressant effects and CBT-SAD's enduring benefit over LT. Seasonal beliefs are theoretically distinct from LT's assumed target and mechanism: correction of circadian phase. This study applies the experimental therapeutics approach to determine how each treatment works when it is effective and to identify the best candidates for each. Biomarkers of LT's target and effect include circadian phase angle difference and the post-illumination pupil response. Biomarkers of CBT-SAD's target and effect include decreased pupillary and sustained frontal gamma-band EEG responses to seasonal words, which are hypothesized as biomarkers of seasonal beliefs, reflecting less engagement with seasonal stimuli following CBT-SAD. In addition to determining change mechanisms, this study tests the efficacy of a "switch" decision rule upon recurrence to inform clinical decision-making in practice. METHODS: Adults with SAD (target N = 160) will be randomzied to 6-weeks of CBT-SAD or LT in winter 1; followed in winter 2; and, if a depression recurrence occurs, offered cross-over into the alternate treatment (i.e., switch from LT➔CBT-SAD or CBT-SAD➔LT). All subjects will be followed in winter 3. Biomarker assessments occur at pre-, mid-, and post-treatment in winter 1, at winter 2 follow-up (and again at mid-/post-treatment for those crossed-over), and at winter 3 follow-up. Primary efficacy analyses will test superiority of CBT-SAD over LT on depression recurrence status (the primary outcome). Mediation analyses will use parallel process latent growth curve modeling. DISCUSSION: Consistent with the National Institute of Mental Health's priorities for demonstrating target engagement at the level of Research Domain Criteria-relevant biomarkers, this work aims to confirm the targets and mechanisms of LT and CBT-SAD to maximize the impact of future dissemination efforts. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03691792 . Registered on October 2, 2018.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
AdultCognitive Behavioral TherapyHumansPhototherapyRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSeasonal Affective DisorderSeasonsTreatment Outcome
Study Links
Quality Scores
SafetyNot Assessed
Efficacy75/10
Quality85/10
0
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.05
Weight Score1.39
Normalized Score0.67
Related Supplements
Elucidating treatment targets and mediators within a confirm... | Panacea Index