Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Effects of scar massage on burn scars: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Journal of clinical nursing
July 1, 2023
Tsai Rung Lin et al. (4 authors)
Journal ArticleMeta-AnalysisSystematic ReviewHuman Study
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to evaluate the physical and psychological effects of scar massage on burn patients, focusing on pain, scar thickness, pruritus, anxiety, and depression.

Results Summary

Scar massage significantly reduced pain, improved scar thickness, decreased pruritus, and lowered anxiety, but had no significant effect on depression. The meta-analysis supports its feasibility and effectiveness for burn patients.

Population

Burn patients with hypertrophic scars.

Effective Dosage

5-30 minutes per session, 1-3 times per week.

Duration

12 weeks.

Interactions

None mentioned.

Extracted Claims (8)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
scar massage
decrease
pain levels
burn patients
standardised mean difference [SMD]: -2.39; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -3.96 to -0.83
decreased
#1
scar massage
decrease
scar thickness
burn patients
mean difference: -0.05; 95% CI: -0.1 to -0.0
improved
#2
scar massage
decrease
pruritus
burn patients
SMD: -1.89; 95% CI: -2.95 to -0.82
reduced
#3
scar massage
decrease
anxiety
burn patients
SMD: -1.52; 95% CI: -2.73 to -0.32
reduced
#4
scar massage
no change
depression
burn patients
SMD: -0.92; 95% CI:-2.28 to 0.44
no significant effect
#5
scar massage
decrease
scar formation
burn patients
-
significantly improved
#6
scar massage
decrease
pruritus
burn patients
-
reduced
#7
scar massage
decrease
anxiety
burn patients
-
reduced
#8
Abstract

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: This study explored the physical and psychological effects of scar massage on burn patients. BACKGROUND: Hypertrophic scar development is highly prevalent following burn injuries. Scar massage may have physical and psychological effects, although evidence of its effectiveness for burn scar improvement remains inconsistent. DESIGN: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials and quasi-experimental trials. METHODS: This study was conducted following the Centre of Reviews and Dissemination guidelines and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PubMed, EMBASE, and Chinese Electronic Periodical Services were searched for studies published between January 1990 and February 2022. Quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Appraisal Checklist. The final recommendation strength was assessed according to the JBI recommendation rating. A meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager Version 5.4 software with a random-effect model. RESULTS: Seven studies (420 participants) investigating scar massage for burn patients were included. The scar massage sessions lasted 5-30 min and were delivered by massage therapists 1-3 times a week for 12 weeks. Overall, scar massage decreased pain levels (standardised mean difference [SMD]: -2.39; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -3.96 to -0.83), improved scar thickness (mean difference: -0.05; 95% CI: -0.1 to -0.0), reduced pruritus (SMD: -1.89; 95% CI: -2.95 to -0.82) and reduced anxiety (SMD: -1.52; 95% CI: -2.73 to -0.32), but no significant effect on depression(SMD: -0.92; 95% CI:-2.28 to 0.44). CONCLUSIONS: The meta-effects of scar massage among burn patients are significantly improved scar formation and reduced pruritus and anxiety. Providing scar massage is feasible and effective for burn patients. Future research should evaluate its long-term effects. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Scar massage is relatively convenient and effective in preventing and alleviating hypertrophic burn scarring. Further research can provide detailed suggestions for effective scar massage implementation.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
HumansAnxietyBurnsCicatrix, HypertrophicMassagePainPruritus
Study Links
Quality Scores
SafetyNot Assessed
Efficacy85/10
Quality90/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations8
Citations/Year4.0
Relative Citation Ratio4.22
NIH Percentile90.9%
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.50
Weight Score2.99
Normalized Score0.72
Related Supplements