The Effect of Massage Force on Relieving Nonspecific Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Study Goal
The researchers aimed to determine the effect of different force levels (high vs. low) during massage on relieving nonspecific low back pain in female patients.
Results Summary
High-force massage significantly reduced pain intensity compared to low-force massage at the end of the intervention, but this difference did not persist at follow-up. No significant effects were observed on disability or quality of life.
Population
56 female patients with nonspecific low back pain at a single medical center.
Effective Dosage
30-minute massage sessions (20 min general, 10 min focal) with high force (≥2 kg) or low force (≤1 kg), totaling six sessions over 3 weeks.
Duration
3 weeks
Interactions
None mentioned
| Intervention | Direction | Endpoint | Population | Dosage | Impact | Claim # |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
high force (HF, ≥2 kg) massage | decrease | pain intensity (visual analog scale (VAS)) | 56 female patients with nonspecific LBP | mean difference of -1.33 points (95% CI: -2.17 to -0.5) | exhibited significantly lower VAS than did the LF group | #1 |
high force (HF, ≥2 kg) massage | decrease | pain relief | female patients with nonspecific LBP | - | exerted superior effects on pain relief | #2 |
Applying different levels of force | no change | LBP-associated disabilities | female patients with nonspecific LBP | - | showed no effects | #3 |
Applying different levels of force | no change | quality of life | female patients with nonspecific LBP | - | showed no effects | #4 |
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of force applied during massage on relieving nonspecific low back pain (LBP). METHODS: This single-blinded, randomized controlled trial enrolled 56 female patients with nonspecific LBP at a single medical center. For each participant, the therapist performed a 30 min massage session (20 min general massage and 10 min focal massage) using a special instrument with a force sensor inserted, for a total of six sessions in 3 weeks. During the 10 min focal massage, HF and LF groups received high force (HF, ≥2 kg) and low force (LF, ≤1 kg) massage, respectively. The primary outcome was pain intensity (i.e., visual analog scale (VAS), 0-10), and secondary outcomes comprised pain pressure threshold, trunk mobility, LBP-associated disability, and quality of life. RESULTS: No significant between-group differences were observed in baseline characteristics. The HF group exhibited significantly lower VAS than did the LF group, with a mean difference of -1.33 points (95% CI: -2.17 to -0.5) at the end of the intervention, but no significant difference was noted at the end of the follow-up. A significant time effect ( CONCLUSIONS: Compared with LF massage, HF massage exerted superior effects on pain relief in female patients with nonspecific LBP at the end of intervention. Applying different levels of force showed no effects on LBP-associated disabilities and quality of life.