Differential effects of intermittent energy restriction vs. continuous energy restriction combined high-intensity interval training on overweight/obese adults: A randomized controlled trial.
Study Goal
The researchers aimed to compare the effects of intermittent energy restriction (IER) and continuous energy restriction (CER) combined with HIIT on weight loss, blood lipids, and cardiorespiratory fitness in overweight/obese adults.
Results Summary
Both IER and CER combined with HIIT led to weight loss and improved body composition, with IER showing greater reductions in body weight, body fat percentage, waist circumference, and hip circumference compared to CER. Blood lipids and cardiorespiratory fitness improved, but changes were not statistically significant.
Population
Overweight/obese adults (age: 21.3 ± 2.24 years, BMI: 25.86 ± 2.64 kg⋅m-2).
Effective Dosage
IER: 30% of energy needs on 2 non-consecutive days/week, 100% on other 5 days; CER: 70% of energy needs daily.
Duration
4 weeks
Interactions
None mentioned
| Intervention | Direction | Endpoint | Population | Dosage | Impact | Claim # |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
intermittent energy restriction (IER) combined with high-intensity interval training (HIIT) | decrease | body weight | overweight/obese adults | 4.57 kg | decreased | #1 |
continuous energy restriction (CER) combined with high-intensity interval training (HIIT) | decrease | body weight | overweight/obese adults | 2.46 kg | decreased | #2 |
intermittent energy restriction (IER) combined with high-intensity interval training (HIIT) | decrease | body composition | overweight/obese adults | - | decreased | #3 |
continuous energy restriction (CER) combined with high-intensity interval training (HIIT) | decrease | body composition | overweight/obese adults | - | decreased | #4 |
normal diet (ND) combined with high-intensity interval training (HIIT) | decrease | body composition | overweight/obese adults | - | decreased | #5 |
intermittent energy restriction (IER) combined with high-intensity interval training (HIIT) | decrease | body circumference | overweight/obese adults | - | decreased | #6 |
continuous energy restriction (CER) combined with high-intensity interval training (HIIT) | decrease | body circumference | overweight/obese adults | - | decreased | #7 |
normal diet (ND) combined with high-intensity interval training (HIIT) | decrease | body circumference | overweight/obese adults | - | decreased | #8 |
intermittent energy restriction (IER) combined with high-intensity interval training (HIIT) | no change | triglyceride (TG) | overweight/obese adults | no significant changes | improved | #9 |
intermittent energy restriction (IER) combined with high-intensity interval training (HIIT) | no change | total cholesterol (TC) | overweight/obese adults | no significant changes | improved | #10 |
intermittent energy restriction (IER) combined with high-intensity interval training (HIIT) | no change | high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-c) | overweight/obese adults | no significant changes | improved | #11 |
intermittent energy restriction (IER) combined with high-intensity interval training (HIIT) | no change | cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) | overweight/obese adults | no significant changes | improved | #12 |
continuous energy restriction (CER) combined with high-intensity interval training (HIIT) | no change | triglyceride (TG) | overweight/obese adults | no significant changes | improved | #13 |
continuous energy restriction (CER) combined with high-intensity interval training (HIIT) | no change | total cholesterol (TC) | overweight/obese adults | no significant changes | improved | #14 |
continuous energy restriction (CER) combined with high-intensity interval training (HIIT) | no change | high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-c) | overweight/obese adults | no significant changes | improved | #15 |
continuous energy restriction (CER) combined with high-intensity interval training (HIIT) | no change | cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) | overweight/obese adults | no significant changes | improved | #16 |
normal diet (ND) combined with high-intensity interval training (HIIT) | no change | triglyceride (TG) | overweight/obese adults | no significant changes | improved | #17 |
normal diet (ND) combined with high-intensity interval training (HIIT) | no change | total cholesterol (TC) | overweight/obese adults | no significant changes | improved | #18 |
normal diet (ND) combined with high-intensity interval training (HIIT) | no change | high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-c) | overweight/obese adults | no significant changes | improved | #19 |
normal diet (ND) combined with high-intensity interval training (HIIT) | no change | cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) | overweight/obese adults | no significant changes | improved | #20 |
intermittent energy restriction (IER) combined with high-intensity interval training (HIIT) | increase | cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) | overweight/obese adults | - | increased | #21 |
continuous energy restriction (CER) combined with high-intensity interval training (HIIT) | increase | cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) | overweight/obese adults | - | increased | #22 |
BACKGROUND: Intermittent energy restriction (IER) and continuous energy restriction (CER) are increasingly popular dietary approaches used for weight loss and overall health. These energy restriction protocols combined with exercise on weight loss and other health outcomes could achieve additional effects in a short-term intervention. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects of a 4-week IER or CER program on weight, blood lipids, and CRF in overweight/obese adults when combined with high-intensity interval training (HIIT). METHODS: Forty-eight overweight/obese adults [age: 21.3 ± 2.24 years, body mass index (BMI): 25.86 ± 2.64 kg⋅m-2] were randomly assigned to iER, cER, and normal diet (ND) groups (n = 16 per group), each consisting of a 4-week intervention. All of the groups completed HIIT intervention (3 min at 80% of V̇O2max followed by 3 min at 50% of V̇O2max ), 30 min/training sessions, five sessions per week. iER subjects consumed 30% of energy needs on 2 non-consecutive days/week, and 100% of energy needs on another 5 days; cER subjects consumed 70% of energy needs; and ND subjects consumed 100% of energy needs. Body composition, waist circumference (WC) and hip circumference (HC), triglyceride (TG), total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-c), high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-c), and cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) were measured before and after the intervention. RESULTS: Of the total 57 participants who underwent randomization, 48 (84.2%) completed the 4-week intervention. After intervention body composition and body circumference decreased in three groups, but no significant differences between groups. The iER tends to be superior to cER in the reduction of body composition and body circumference. The mean body weight loss was 4.57 kg (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.1-5.0, p < 0.001) in iER and 2.46 kg (95% CI, 4.1-5.0, p < 0.001) in iER. The analyses of BMI, BF%, WC, and HC were consistent with the primary outcome results. In addition, TG, TC, HDL-c, and CRF improved after intervention but without significant changes (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Both IER and CER could be effective in weight loss and increased CRF when combined with HIIT. However, iER showed greater benefits for body weight, BF%, WC, and HC compared with cER.