Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Differential effects of intermittent energy restriction vs. continuous energy restriction combined high-intensity interval training on overweight/obese adults: A randomized controlled trial.

Frontiers in nutrition
May 5, 2022
Rui Xu et al. (4 authors)
Journal ArticleHuman Study
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to compare the effects of intermittent energy restriction (IER) and continuous energy restriction (CER) combined with HIIT on weight loss, blood lipids, and cardiorespiratory fitness in overweight/obese adults.

Results Summary

Both IER and CER combined with HIIT led to weight loss and improved body composition, with IER showing greater reductions in body weight, body fat percentage, waist circumference, and hip circumference compared to CER. Blood lipids and cardiorespiratory fitness improved, but changes were not statistically significant.

Population

Overweight/obese adults (age: 21.3 ± 2.24 years, BMI: 25.86 ± 2.64 kg⋅m-2).

Effective Dosage

IER: 30% of energy needs on 2 non-consecutive days/week, 100% on other 5 days; CER: 70% of energy needs daily.

Duration

4 weeks

Interactions

None mentioned

Extracted Claims (22)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
intermittent energy restriction (IER) combined with high-intensity interval training (HIIT)
decrease
body weight
overweight/obese adults
4.57 kg
decreased
#1
continuous energy restriction (CER) combined with high-intensity interval training (HIIT)
decrease
body weight
overweight/obese adults
2.46 kg
decreased
#2
intermittent energy restriction (IER) combined with high-intensity interval training (HIIT)
decrease
body composition
overweight/obese adults
-
decreased
#3
continuous energy restriction (CER) combined with high-intensity interval training (HIIT)
decrease
body composition
overweight/obese adults
-
decreased
#4
normal diet (ND) combined with high-intensity interval training (HIIT)
decrease
body composition
overweight/obese adults
-
decreased
#5
intermittent energy restriction (IER) combined with high-intensity interval training (HIIT)
decrease
body circumference
overweight/obese adults
-
decreased
#6
continuous energy restriction (CER) combined with high-intensity interval training (HIIT)
decrease
body circumference
overweight/obese adults
-
decreased
#7
normal diet (ND) combined with high-intensity interval training (HIIT)
decrease
body circumference
overweight/obese adults
-
decreased
#8
intermittent energy restriction (IER) combined with high-intensity interval training (HIIT)
no change
triglyceride (TG)
overweight/obese adults
no significant changes
improved
#9
intermittent energy restriction (IER) combined with high-intensity interval training (HIIT)
no change
total cholesterol (TC)
overweight/obese adults
no significant changes
improved
#10
intermittent energy restriction (IER) combined with high-intensity interval training (HIIT)
no change
high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-c)
overweight/obese adults
no significant changes
improved
#11
intermittent energy restriction (IER) combined with high-intensity interval training (HIIT)
no change
cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF)
overweight/obese adults
no significant changes
improved
#12
continuous energy restriction (CER) combined with high-intensity interval training (HIIT)
no change
triglyceride (TG)
overweight/obese adults
no significant changes
improved
#13
continuous energy restriction (CER) combined with high-intensity interval training (HIIT)
no change
total cholesterol (TC)
overweight/obese adults
no significant changes
improved
#14
continuous energy restriction (CER) combined with high-intensity interval training (HIIT)
no change
high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-c)
overweight/obese adults
no significant changes
improved
#15
continuous energy restriction (CER) combined with high-intensity interval training (HIIT)
no change
cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF)
overweight/obese adults
no significant changes
improved
#16
normal diet (ND) combined with high-intensity interval training (HIIT)
no change
triglyceride (TG)
overweight/obese adults
no significant changes
improved
#17
normal diet (ND) combined with high-intensity interval training (HIIT)
no change
total cholesterol (TC)
overweight/obese adults
no significant changes
improved
#18
normal diet (ND) combined with high-intensity interval training (HIIT)
no change
high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-c)
overweight/obese adults
no significant changes
improved
#19
normal diet (ND) combined with high-intensity interval training (HIIT)
no change
cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF)
overweight/obese adults
no significant changes
improved
#20
intermittent energy restriction (IER) combined with high-intensity interval training (HIIT)
increase
cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF)
overweight/obese adults
-
increased
#21
continuous energy restriction (CER) combined with high-intensity interval training (HIIT)
increase
cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF)
overweight/obese adults
-
increased
#22
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Intermittent energy restriction (IER) and continuous energy restriction (CER) are increasingly popular dietary approaches used for weight loss and overall health. These energy restriction protocols combined with exercise on weight loss and other health outcomes could achieve additional effects in a short-term intervention. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects of a 4-week IER or CER program on weight, blood lipids, and CRF in overweight/obese adults when combined with high-intensity interval training (HIIT). METHODS: Forty-eight overweight/obese adults [age: 21.3 ± 2.24 years, body mass index (BMI): 25.86 ± 2.64 kg⋅m-2] were randomly assigned to iER, cER, and normal diet (ND) groups (n = 16 per group), each consisting of a 4-week intervention. All of the groups completed HIIT intervention (3 min at 80% of V̇O2max followed by 3 min at 50% of V̇O2max ), 30 min/training sessions, five sessions per week. iER subjects consumed 30% of energy needs on 2 non-consecutive days/week, and 100% of energy needs on another 5 days; cER subjects consumed 70% of energy needs; and ND subjects consumed 100% of energy needs. Body composition, waist circumference (WC) and hip circumference (HC), triglyceride (TG), total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-c), high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-c), and cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) were measured before and after the intervention. RESULTS: Of the total 57 participants who underwent randomization, 48 (84.2%) completed the 4-week intervention. After intervention body composition and body circumference decreased in three groups, but no significant differences between groups. The iER tends to be superior to cER in the reduction of body composition and body circumference. The mean body weight loss was 4.57 kg (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.1-5.0, p < 0.001) in iER and 2.46 kg (95% CI, 4.1-5.0, p < 0.001) in iER. The analyses of BMI, BF%, WC, and HC were consistent with the primary outcome results. In addition, TG, TC, HDL-c, and CRF improved after intervention but without significant changes (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Both IER and CER could be effective in weight loss and increased CRF when combined with HIIT. However, iER showed greater benefits for body weight, BF%, WC, and HC compared with cER.

Study Links
Quality Scores
SafetyNot Assessed
Efficacy85/10
Quality75/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations4
Citations/Year1.3
Relative Citation Ratio0.65
NIH Percentile34.8%
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.25
Weight Score1.19
Normalized Score0.69