Substantiating the Therapeutic Effects of Simultaneous Heat Massage Combined with Conventional Physical Therapy for Treatment of Lower Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Feasibility Trial.
| Intervention | Direction | Endpoint | Population | Dosage | Impact | Claim # |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
simultaneous heat massage therapy | decrease | serum epinephrine (EP) levels | patients with subacute lower back pain | - | decreased | #1 |
simultaneous heat massage therapy | decrease | serum norepinephrine (NE) levels | patients with subacute lower back pain | - | decreased | #2 |
simultaneous heat massage therapy | decrease | pain numeric rating scale (PNRS) scores | patients with subacute lower back pain | without significance | improved | #3 |
conventional physical therapy | decrease | pain numeric rating scale (PNRS) scores | patients with subacute lower back pain | without significance | improved | #4 |
simultaneous heat massage therapy | decrease | Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores | patients with subacute lower back pain | without significance | improved | #5 |
conventional physical therapy | decrease | Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores | patients with subacute lower back pain | without significance | improved | #6 |
simultaneous heat massage therapy | decrease | Roland-Morris disability questionnaire (RMDQ) scores | patients with subacute lower back pain | without significance | improved | #7 |
conventional physical therapy | decrease | Roland-Morris disability questionnaire (RMDQ) scores | patients with subacute lower back pain | without significance | improved | #8 |
simultaneous heat massage therapy | decrease | short-form McGill pain questionnaire (SF-MPQ) scores | patients with subacute lower back pain | without significance | improved | #9 |
conventional physical therapy | decrease | short-form McGill pain questionnaire (SF-MPQ) scores | patients with subacute lower back pain | without significance | improved | #10 |
simultaneous heat massage therapy | decrease | Beck depression inventory (BDI) score | patients with subacute lower back pain | - | showed improvement | #11 |
simultaneous heat massage therapy | decrease | multidimensional fatigue inventory (MFI-20) score | patients with subacute lower back pain | - | improved | #12 |
conventional physical therapy | decrease | multidimensional fatigue inventory (MFI-20) score | patients with subacute lower back pain | - | improved | #13 |
simultaneous heat massage therapy | decrease | all the activities of surface EMG (sEMG) | patients with subacute lower back pain | - | significantly decreased | #14 |
conventional physical therapy | decrease | all the activities of surface EMG (sEMG) | patients with subacute lower back pain | - | significantly decreased | #15 |
simultaneous heat massage therapy | decrease | SSR latency on sEMG | patients with subacute lower back pain | - | decreased | #16 |
simultaneous heat massage therapy | increase | SSR amplitude on sEMG | patients with subacute lower back pain | - | increased | #17 |
heat massage | no change | improving lower back pain and pain-related disability | patients with subacute lower back pain | - | was not superior to | #18 |
heat massage | increase | control of autonomic nerve function | patients with subacute lower back pain | - | was shown to have a better effect on | #19 |
heat massage | increase | control of underlying moods | patients with subacute lower back pain | - | was shown to have a better effect on | #20 |
BACKGROUND: There are various therapeutic options for the conservative management of lower back pain (LBP). A combination of two or more treatment options may be more effective in the clinical management of non-specific LBP. In this study, we compared the effects of simultaneous heat massage with conventional physical therapy in patients with subacute LBP. METHODS: A single-center randomized controlled trial in which 40 participants with LBP were allocated to one of two groups: a heat massage group (HMG) and physical therapy group (PTG). The HMG received simultaneous heat massage therapy using a mechanical device (CGM MB-1401, Ceragem, Republic of Korea). The PTG received conventional physical therapy. Both groups received 40 min of therapy once daily, five times a week, for a total of four weeks. Changes in serum cortisol, epinephrine (EP), and norepinephrine (NE) were assessed. The outcomes were measured using the pain numeric rating scale (PNRS), the Oswestry disability index (ODI), the Roland-Morris disability questionnaire (RMDQ), the short-form McGill pain questionnaire (SF-MPQ), the multidimensional fatigue inventory (MFI-20), the Beck depression inventory (BDI), surface EMG (sEMG), and sympathetic skin response (SSR) at baseline (PRE), at 2 (2 W) and 4 weeks (4 W) following the intervention. RESULTS: The serum EP and NE levels in the HMG decreased after treatment. The PNRS, ODI, RMDQ, and SF-MPQ scores improved without significance in both groups. The BDI score showed improvement in the HMG before the PTG. The MFI-20 score improved in both groups, but the results were better in the HMG than in the PTG at 4 W. All the activities of sEMG were significantly decreased in both groups. However, the improvement of the %MVIC in the HMG was better than that in the PTG at 4 W. The SSR latency on sEMG decreased while the amplitude increased in the HMG at 2 W and 4 W, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Following 4 weeks of combined therapies, heat massage was not superior to conventional physical therapy alone. Both treatments were shown to be effective in improving LBP and pain-related disability. However, heat massage was shown to have a better effect on the control of autonomic nerve function and underlying moods.