Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Massage therapy can effectively relieve cancer pain: A meta-analysis.

Medicine
January 1, 1970
Yueyue Zhang et al. (7 authors)
Systematic ReviewMeta-AnalysisJournal ArticleHuman Study
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to evaluate the effects of massage therapy on cancer pain, focusing on its efficacy and safety in patients with various cancers.

Results Summary

Massage therapy significantly relieved cancer pain, particularly in perioperative patients and those with hematological malignancies. Foot reflexology and hand acupressure were moderately effective, with hand acupressure showing better results, and no adverse events were reported.

Population

Patients with hematological malignancies, breast cancer, and cancers of the digestive system.

Effective Dosage

Massage duration of 10 to 30 minutes.

Duration

Program length of ≥1 week.

Interactions

None mentioned

Extracted Claims (11)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
Massage therapy
decrease
cancer pain
patients
standardized mean difference = -1.16, 95% confidence interval [-1.39, -0.93], P < .00001
could significantly relieve
#1
Massage therapy
decrease
cancer pain
patients in the perioperative period
-
had a better effect
#2
Massage therapy
decrease
cancer pain
patients with hematological malignancies
-
had a better effect
#3
Foot reflexology
decrease
cancer pain relief
-
-
had a moderate effect on
#4
Hand acupressure
decrease
cancer pain relief
-
-
had a moderate effect on
#5
Hand acupressure
decrease
cancer pain relief
-
-
being more effective
#6
Massage duration of 10 to 30 minutes
decrease
cancer pain
-
-
had a better effect
#7
Massage duration of 10 to 30 minutes
decrease
pain
-
-
could significantly relieve
#8
Program length of ≥1 week
decrease
cancer pain
-
-
had a better effect
#9
Program length of ≥1 week
decrease
pain
-
-
could significantly relieve
#10
Massage therapy
no change
adverse events
-
no adverse events
occurrence of adverse events
#11
Abstract

BACKGROUND: To critically evaluate the effects of massage therapy on cancer pain. METHODS: Nine Chinese and English databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, SCOPUS, Web of Science core, China Biomedical Literature Database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang, and VIP) were systematically searched from the inception of databases to November 2022 for randomized controlled trials. According to Cochrane Collaboration, 2 reviewers independently assessed the risk of bias and extracted data from the included studies. All analyses were performed with Review Manager 5.4. RESULTS: Thirteen randomized controlled trials were included in the meta-analysis, containing 1000 patients (498 in the massage therapy group and 502 in the control group). Massage therapy could significantly relieve cancer pain in patients (standardized mean difference = -1.16, 95% confidence interval [-1.39, -0.93], P < .00001), especially those in the perioperative period and those with hematological malignancies. Foot reflexology and hand acupressure had a moderate effect on cancer pain relief, with hand acupressure being more effective. Massage duration of 10 to 30 minutes and a program length of ≥1 week had a better effect and could significantly relieve pain. The occurrence of adverse events was reported in 4 of the 13 studies, all of which were no adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Massage therapy can be used as a complementary alternative therapy to relieve cancer pain in patients with hematological malignancies, breast cancer, and cancers of the digestive system. It is suggested that chemotherapy patients use foot reflexology, and perioperative period patients use hand acupressure. A massage duration of 10 to 30 minutes and a program length of ≥1 week is recommended to achieve better effects.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
HumansFemaleCancer PainMassageComplementary TherapiesBreast NeoplasmsHematologic Neoplasms
Study Links
Quality Scores
Safety100
Efficacy85/10
Quality80/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations12
Citations/Year6.0
Relative Citation Ratio4.05
NIH Percentile90.3%
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.75
Weight Score1.68
Normalized Score0.90
Related Supplements