Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Melatonin Supplementation for Cancer-Related Fatigue in Patients With Early Stage Breast Cancer Receiving Radiotherapy: A Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial.

The oncologist
January 1, 1970
Nitai D Mukhopadhyay et al. (9 authors)
Randomized Controlled TrialClinical Trial, Phase IIIJournal ArticleHuman StudyClinical
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to assess whether melatonin could prevent fatigue and other symptoms in patients with breast cancer undergoing radiotherapy.

Results Summary

Melatonin did not significantly improve fatigue or other symptoms compared to placebo, with no statistically significant differences observed in primary or secondary endpoints. The supplement was well-tolerated with no severe adverse events reported.

Population

Female patients (≥18 years) with early-stage or ductal carcinoma in situ breast cancer undergoing radiotherapy.

Effective Dosage

20 mg orally, starting the night before radiotherapy initiation until 2 weeks post-radiotherapy.

Duration

From the night before radiotherapy initiation until 2 weeks post-radiotherapy.

Interactions

None mentioned

Extracted Claims (17)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
melatonin 20 mg
no change
FACIT-Fatigue scale
patients with breast cancer undergoing RT
P-value .83
did not demonstrate statistical significance
#1
melatonin 20 mg
no change
FACIT physical well-being scores
patients with breast cancer undergoing RT
P-values of .35
did not demonstrate statistical significance
#2
melatonin 20 mg
no change
FACIT social well-being scores
patients with breast cancer undergoing RT
P-values of .06
did not demonstrate statistical significance
#3
melatonin 20 mg
no change
FACIT emotional well-being scores
patients with breast cancer undergoing RT
P-values of .62
did not demonstrate statistical significance
#4
melatonin 20 mg
no change
FACIT functional well-being scores
patients with breast cancer undergoing RT
P-values of .71
did not demonstrate statistical significance
#5
melatonin 20 mg
no change
Total PROMIS scores
patients with breast cancer undergoing RT
P-value is .34
did not demonstrate statistically significant change
#6
melatonin 20 mg
no change
ESAS anxiety
patients with breast cancer undergoing RT
P = .56
found to be nonsignificant
#7
melatonin 20 mg
no change
ESAS well-being
patients with breast cancer undergoing RT
.82
found to be nonsignificant
#8
melatonin 20 mg
no change
ESAS drowsiness
patients with breast cancer undergoing RT
.83
found to be nonsignificant
#9
melatonin 20 mg
no change
ESAS lack of appetite
patients with breast cancer undergoing RT
.35
found to be nonsignificant
#10
melatonin 20 mg
no change
ESAS nausea
patients with breast cancer undergoing RT
.79
found to be nonsignificant
#11
melatonin 20 mg
no change
ESAS pain
patients with breast cancer undergoing RT
.50
found to be nonsignificant
#12
melatonin 20 mg
no change
ESAS shortness of breath
patients with breast cancer undergoing RT
.77
found to be nonsignificant
#13
melatonin 20 mg
no change
ESAS sleep
patients with breast cancer undergoing RT
.45
found to be nonsignificant
#14
melatonin 20 mg
no change
ESAS tiredness
patients with breast cancer undergoing RT
.56
found to be nonsignificant
#15
placebo
decrease
ESAS Depression
patients with breast cancer undergoing RT
0.01 unit
demonstrating statistical significance with a decrease
#16
melatonin 20 mg
no change
fatigue and other symptoms
patients with early stage breast cancer undergoing RT
-
did not prevent or significantly improve
#17
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Fatigue is common in patients undergoing radiotherapy (RT) and can significantly impact quality of life. Melatonin, a safe inexpensive natural supplement, may improve symptoms and attenuate the side effects of RT. The purpose of this randomized double-blind placebo-controlled phase III trial was to assess the effects of melatonin for preventing fatigue and other symptoms in patients with breast cancer undergoing RT. METHODS: Female early stage or Ductal carcinoma in situ patients with breast cancer ≥18 years of age with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status <3, hemoglobin ≥9 g/dL, planned for outpatient RT treatment with curative intent, were randomized 1:1 to melatonin 20 mg or placebo, orally, starting the night before RT initiation until 2 weeks post-RT. Randomization was stratified according to treatment duration (<3 weeks, ≥3 weeks) and prior chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue scale), and secondary endpoints were FACIT-F subscales, Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS), and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores obtained at baseline, and 2 and 8 weeks post-RT. A 2-sided ANOVA F-test at a 4.5% significance level for the primary endpoint was used. Secondary analyses were reported using an F-test at a 5% significance level. The goal was to recruit approximately 140 patients with interim analysis planned mid-recruitment. RESULTS: Eighty-five patients were screened for eligibility; 79 patients were randomized: 40 to melatonin and 39 to placebo; 78 patients were treated and included in the interim analysis at the mid-recruitment point. Baseline patient characteristics of age, race, and ECOG performance status were similar in both arms. The treatment effect was studied using a longitudinal mixed effects model with the effect of treatment over time (treatment × time) as the primary outcome parameter. The treatment × time for FACIT-Fatigue did not demonstrate statistical significance (P-value .83) in the melatonin group compared to placebo. In addition, secondary analyses of FACIT physical, social, emotional, and functional well-being scores did not demonstrate statistical significance (P-values of .35, .06, .62, and .71, respectively). Total PROMIS scores, collected as secondary outcome reported by patients, did not demonstrate statistically significant change over time either (P-value is .34). The other secondary scale, ESAS, was analyzed for each individual item and found to be nonsignificant, anxiety (P = .56), well-being (.82), drowsiness (.83), lack of appetite (.35), nausea (.79), pain (.50), shortness of breath (.77), sleep (.45), and tiredness (.56). Depression was the only item demonstrating statistical significance with a decrease of 0.01 unit in the placebo group, a change not considered clinically significant. Melatonin was well-tolerated with no grade 3 or 4 adverse events reported. The most common side effects were headache, somnolence, and abdominal pain. No patients died while participating in this study. Two patients died within a year of study completion from breast cancer recurrence. Sixteen patients withdrew prior to study completion for various reasons including adverse events, hospitalizations unrelated to study drug, RT discontinuation, and COVID-19 precautions. CONCLUSIONS: In this double-blind placebo-controlled phase III trial, melatonin did not prevent or significantly improve fatigue and other symptoms in patients with early stage breast cancer undergoing RT. The analysis, showing little evidence of an effect, at mid-recruitment, assured early termination of the trial.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
HumansFemaleInfant, NewbornMelatoninBreast NeoplasmsQuality of LifeNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalFatigueDietary SupplementsDouble-Blind MethodTreatment Outcome
Study Links
Quality Scores
Safety85
Efficacy20/10
Quality75/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations6
Citations/Year6.0
Relative Citation Ratio2.56
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.75
Weight Score1.53
Normalized Score0.57
Related Supplements
Melatonin Supplementation for Cancer-Related Fatigue in Pati... | Panacea Index