Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Low-Carbohydrate Diet is More Helpful for Weight Loss Than Low-Fat Diet in Adolescents with Overweight and Obesity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy
May 5, 2024
Yu Zhang et al. (4 authors)
Journal ArticleReviewHuman Study
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to compare the effects of a low-fat diet (LFD) and a low-carbohydrate diet (LCD) on body weight and lipid levels in adolescents with overweight and obesity.

Results Summary

The study found that LCD was more effective than LFD in reducing weight, BMI, and triglycerides while increasing HDL levels, but no significant differences were observed in HOMA-IR, body fat percentage, total cholesterol, or LDL between the two diets.

Population

Adolescents with overweight and obesity.

Effective Dosage

Not specified

Duration

Not specified

Interactions

None mentioned

Extracted Claims (8)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
low-carbohydrate diet (LCD)
decrease
Weight
adolescents with overweight and obesity
mean difference -2.81; 95% CI -5.38 to -0.25
were significantly lower than that of the LFD
#1
low-carbohydrate diet (LCD)
decrease
Body Mass Index (BMI)
adolescents with overweight and obesity
-1.13; 95% CI -2.14 to -0.11
were significantly lower than that of the LFD
#2
low-carbohydrate diet (LCD)
decrease
Triglyceride (TG)
adolescents with overweight and obesity
-0.36; 95% CI -0.46 to -0.27
were significantly lower than that of the LFD
#3
low-carbohydrate diet (LCD)
increase
high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL)
adolescents with overweight and obesity
0.08; 95% CI 0.04 to 0.12
were significantly higher than those of the LFD
#4
low-carbohydrate diet (LCD)
no change
Homeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR)
adolescents with overweight and obesity
P>0.05
no significant difference
#5
low-carbohydrate diet (LCD)
no change
percent body fat
adolescents with overweight and obesity
P>0.05
no significant difference
#6
low-carbohydrate diet (LCD)
no change
total cholesterol (TC)
adolescents with overweight and obesity
P>0.05
no significant difference
#7
low-carbohydrate diet (LCD)
no change
low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL)
adolescents with overweight and obesity
P>0.05
no significant difference
#8
Abstract

PURPOSE: This manuscript performed a meta-analysis to compare the effects of a low-fat diet (LFD) and a low-carbohydrate diet (LCD) on body weight and lipid levels in adolescents with overweight and obesity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: PubMed and other databases were searched for the full-text literature comparing LFD and LCD up to November 2023 using a subject plus free word strategy, with search terms such as "low-fat diet", "low-carbohydrate diet", "obesity", "weight", "adolescents", "RCT", and so on. Two independent reviewers selected promising candidate trials, collected the data, and assessed the quality of the trials. RevMan 5.3 software was utilized to conduct a meta-analysis of the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that were included. RESULTS: 5 RCTs with 192 participants were included in this meta-analysis. Weight (mean difference -2.81; 95% CI -5.38 to -0.25), Body Mass Index (BMI) (-1.13; 95% CI -2.14 to -0.11) and Triglyceride (TG) (-0.36; 95% CI -0.46 to -0.27) of the LCD were significantly lower than that of the LFD. At the same time, the high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL) levels of the LCD were significantly higher than those of the LFD (0.08; 95% CI 0.04 to 0.12) (P < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference in the Homeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR), percent body fat, total cholesterol (TC), and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL) between the two groups (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: According to this study, LCD is more helpful in improving weight loss, HDL and TG. Thus, LCD may serve as an effective intervention for weight management in adolescents with overweight and obesity, although further research is needed to determine its long-term effects.

Study Links
Quality Scores
SafetyNot Assessed
Efficacy65/10
Quality75/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations2
Citations/Year2.0
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.75
Weight Score2.60
Normalized Score0.61
Related Supplements