Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Acceptability, usage, and efficacy of mindfulness apps for college student mental health: A systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs.

Journal of affective disorders
January 1, 1970
Liva G LaMontagne et al. (7 authors)
Journal ArticleMeta-AnalysisSystematic ReviewHuman Study
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to evaluate the acceptability, usage, and efficacy of mindfulness training apps on mental health outcomes (stress, anxiety, depression, and emotional well-being) among non-clinical samples of college students.

Results Summary

Mindfulness apps were found acceptable and showed small to medium effects in reducing stress and improving emotional well-being, with smaller effects on anxiety and depression. The certainty of evidence was moderate for stress, depression, and well-being, and low-to-moderate for anxiety.

Population

Non-clinical samples of college students (total N = 2974).

Effective Dosage

Not specified

Duration

Not specified

Interactions

None mentioned

Extracted Claims (6)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
mindfulness training apps
decrease
stress
non-clinical samples of college students
0.435 standard deviation units
reduced
#1
mindfulness training apps
increase
emotional well-being
non-clinical samples of college students
0.431
increased
#2
mindfulness training apps
decrease
depression
non-clinical samples of college students
B = -0.219
had small effects on
#3
mindfulness training apps
decrease
anxiety
non-clinical samples of college students
B = -0.218
had small effects on
#4
mindfulness training apps
increase
stress, anxiety, emotional well-being
distressed participants
-
had larger improvements in all outcomes except depression
#5
mindfulness training apps
increase
student mental health
college students
similar or larger effect sizes than in the general adult population
may improve
#6
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Preventing anxiety and depression among college students is a pressing public health need. Recent meta-analyses have examined mobile mindfulness interventions in adult populations; however, college students are in a unique developmental stage and institutional setting. METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of published and unpublished studies in English language on the acceptability, usage, and efficacy of mindfulness training apps on mental health among non-clinical samples of college students. Out of 167 reviewed studies, 47 were included in the narrative review. Additionally, we summarized effects from 19 stress, 12 anxiety, 13 depression, and 8 emotional well-being trials (total N = 2974) using robust variance estimation meta-regression and evaluated certainty of evidence with the GRADE approach. RESULTS: Apps were acceptable, with usage levels varying. They reduced stress by 0.435 standard deviation units, 95 % CI (-0.615,-0.255), and increased emotional well-being by 0.431 (0.162,0.7) approaching medium effect sizes. The apps had small effects on depression (B = -0.219 (-0.374, -0.065)) and anxiety (B = -0.218 (-0.42, -0.016)). Certainty of evidence was moderate for stress, depression, and well-being; and low-to-moderate for anxiety. Distressed participants had larger improvements in all outcomes except depression. LIMITATIONS: Small sample sizes in the original studies and small numbers of studies limit the precision of our effect estimates. The small number of studies with objective usage data impedes our ability to characterize the optimal dose. CONCLUSIONS: With moderate certainty of evidence, mindfulness training apps may improve student mental health with similar or larger effect sizes than in the general adult population. However, sustained usage may be a challenge, and more research is needed on the optimal implementation strategy, dose, and equity.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
AdultHumansYoung AdultAnxietyDepressionMental HealthMindfulnessMobile ApplicationsPatient Acceptance of Health CareRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicStress, PsychologicalStudentsUniversities
Study Links
Quality Scores
SafetyNot Assessed
Efficacy75/10
Quality80/10
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.05
Weight Score1.33
Normalized Score0.66
Related Supplements