Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

The Efficacy and Durability of Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy in the Treatment of Anxiety and Depressive Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Indian journal of psychological medicine
May 29, 2024
Nikapitiye Nandarathana et al. (2 authors)
Journal ArticleReviewHuman Study
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and durability of Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT) in treating anxiety and depressive disorders.

Results Summary

The meta-analysis found MBCT significantly reduced symptoms of anxiety and depression, with effects maintained at follow-up, indicating long-term treatment benefits.

Population

Adults diagnosed with anxiety or depressive disorders per DSM-IV-TR or ICD-10 criteria.

Effective Dosage

Not specified

Duration

Not specified

Interactions

None mentioned

Extracted Claims (4)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT)
decrease
anxiety symptoms
adults diagnosed with anxiety or depressive disorders
-0.4806 [CI: -0.7185; -0.2428]
showed an overall standardized mean difference of -0.4806
#1
mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT)
decrease
depression symptoms
adults diagnosed with anxiety or depressive disorders
-0.3817 [CI: -0.5407; -0.2228]
showed an overall standardized mean difference of -0.3817
#2
mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT)
no change
depression symptoms
adults diagnosed with anxiety or depressive disorders
0.0130 [CI: -0.2109; 0.2369]
showed a small and nonsignificant effect size
#3
mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT)
no change
anxiety symptoms
adults diagnosed with anxiety or depressive disorders
0.0198 [CI: -0.0660; 0.1057]
showed a small and nonsignificant effect size
#4
Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is a dearth of meta-analytical studies measuring the durability of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) in the treatment of anxiety and depressive disorders. Therefore, the present study was conducted to evaluate both the effectiveness and durability of MBCT in the treatment of depression and anxiety disorders. METHODS: We systematically searched six databases from June 11, 2023 to September 16, 2023 for randomized control trials (RCTs) of adults diagnosed with anxiety or depressive disorders as per the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision or the Tenth Revision of the International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems diagnostic criteria; the treatment group received the complete form of MBCT, whereas the control group received other interventions or treatment as usual; the treatment outcome focused on symptoms of depression or anxiety. Two independent reviewers included studies, assessed quality, and extracted data. The Cochrane Risk-of-Bias 2.0 tool was applied to appraise the methodological quality of the included studies. R 4.2.1 software and the "metafor" package were used to estimate the effect sizes based on mean and standard deviation of anxiety and depressive disorders at baseline and postintervention, and at postintervention and follow-up periods for both the treatment and control groups. RESULT: A total of 1,470 studies were reviewed, and 21 RCTs met the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis showed an overall standardized mean difference of -0.4806 [CI: -0.7185; -0.2428] and -0.3817 [CI: -0.5407; -0.2228] for reducing anxiety and depression symptoms, respectively indicating the effectiveness of MBCT. Comparison between postintervention and follow-up or follow-up measurement showed a small and nonsignificant effect size for depression (0.0130 [CI: -0.2109; 0.2369]) and anxiety (0.0198 [CI: -0.0660; 0.1057]), suggesting that recovered symptoms in the treatment group were maintained until the follow-up evaluation. CONCLUSION: MBCT produces long-term treatment effects in the management of both depressive and anxiety disorders. PROTOCOL PREREGISTRATION: The current meta-analysis followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and got registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023465494).

Study Links
Quality Scores
SafetyNot Assessed
Efficacy85/10
Quality90/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations2
Citations/Year2.0
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.50
Weight Score2.91
Normalized Score0.72