Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Application of the end-of-life demands card game and mindfulness-based cancer recovery program for reducing negative emotion in patients with advanced lung cancer: a randomized controlled trial.

Frontiers in psychology
May 5, 2025
Xian Luo et al. (6 authors)
Journal ArticleHuman Study
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to explore the effectiveness of a mindfulness-based cancer recovery program (MBCR) combined with an end-of-life demands card game (ELDCG) in alleviating death anxiety, anxiety, depression, and stress in patients with advanced lung cancer.

Results Summary

The intervention group showed significantly lower scores in death anxiety, anxiety, depression, and stress compared to the control group after the 6-week program. The MBCR appeared to offer strategies for managing stress and improving emotional coping.

Population

Patients with advanced lung cancer in China.

Effective Dosage

Not specified (MBCR program duration was 5 weeks, following the ELDCG in the first week).

Duration

6 weeks

Interactions

None mentioned

Extracted Claims (5)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
end-of-life demands card game (ELDCG) and mindfulness-based cancer recovery program (MBCR) programs
decrease
death anxiety
patients with advanced lung cancer
p < 0.001
showed significantly lower scores
#1
end-of-life demands card game (ELDCG) and mindfulness-based cancer recovery program (MBCR) programs
decrease
anxiety
patients with advanced lung cancer
p < 0.001
showed significantly lower scores
#2
end-of-life demands card game (ELDCG) and mindfulness-based cancer recovery program (MBCR) programs
decrease
depression
patients with advanced lung cancer
p < 0.001
showed significantly lower scores
#3
end-of-life demands card game (ELDCG) and mindfulness-based cancer recovery program (MBCR) programs
decrease
stress
patients with advanced lung cancer
p < 0.001
showed significantly lower scores
#4
end-of-life demands card game (ELDCG)
increase
card selection
patients with advanced lung cancer
13 times
had the highest selection frequency
#5
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths globally and the most common type of cancer in China, posing significant health and socio-economic challenges. Despite the effectiveness of psychological interventions for death anxiety, discussions around death are often avoided in China due to cultural taboos and neglect of end-of-life care. PURPOSE: This study aimed to explore the effectiveness of the self-designed end-of-life demands card game (ELDCG) and mindfulness-based cancer recovery program (MBCR) programs in alleviating death anxiety, anxiety, depression, and stress in patients with advanced lung cancer. METHODS: This was a randomized, single anonymized study. We randomly assigned 77 patients into two groups: the intervention group (38 patients) and the control group (39 patients). Routine health promotion was implemented in the intervention group, along with the ELDCG combined with the MBCR program, while the control group only received routine health promotion. The intervention lasted for 6 weeks. The intervention group completed the ELDCG within the first week, and the MBCR was completed during the remaining 5 weeks. The primary outcome was the Templer's Death Anxiety Scale (T-DAS) score, and the secondary outcomes were the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) score, the score on the Chinese version of the Perceived Stress Scale (CPSS), and frequency of selection in the ELDCG. The assessment results of these scales were collected both before the intervention began and after the 6-week intervention period. The frequency of card selections was recorded after the ELDCG. RESULTS: After implementing the 6-week ELDCG and MBCR program, the intervention group showed significantly lower scores than the control group in death anxiety (p < 0.001), anxiety (p < 0.001), depression (p < 0.001), and stress (p < 0.001). The card with the highest selection frequency (13 times) was "I need the right to choose treatment options and understand the expected outcomes." CONCLUSION: The ELDCG might assist patients in emotionally coming to terms with death, while the MBCR offered potential strategies for managing stress. Together, they seemed to alleviate death anxiety and negative emotions by addressing these psychological factors, which in turn improves patients' ability to manage their illness. This improvement not only enhances their quality of life but also helps prevent the unnecessary consumption of healthcare resources, thus alleviating some of the financial strain on the healthcare system. Future research should assess the long-term effects and explore broader applications for terminally ill patients. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://clinicaltrials.gov/, identifier ChiCTR2400081628.

Study Links
Quality Scores
SafetyNot Assessed
Efficacy85/10
Quality75/10
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.05
Weight Score2.50
Normalized Score0.69
Related Supplements