Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

The effect of percussion massage therapy on the recovery of delayed onset muscle soreness in physically active young men-a randomized controlled trial.

Frontiers in public health
May 5, 2025
Haiwei Li et al. (6 authors)
Comparative StudyJournal ArticleRandomized Controlled TrialHuman StudyClinical
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to determine whether percussive massage treatment (PMT) is more effective than static stretching for recovery from delayed onset muscle soreness (DOMS) in physically active young men.

Results Summary

The study found that long-duration PMT (40 minutes) was significantly more effective than static stretching and short-duration PMT (25 minutes) in improving jump performance, reducing muscle activity, lowering pain scores, and increasing knee joint range of motion. The benefits were most pronounced 48 hours post-intervention.

Population

Thirty physically active male college students.

Effective Dosage

Two sessions of either 25-minute PMT (S-PMT) or 40-minute PMT (L-PMT).

Duration

Effects were measured immediately post-intervention and up to 48 hours later.

Interactions

None mentioned.

Extracted Claims (10)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
long-duration percussive massage treatment (L-PMT)
increase
jump height during the countermovement jump propulsion phase
physically active young men
p < 0.001, d = 8.691 compared to SS; p = 0.006, d = 4.37 compared to S-PMT
demonstrated significantly greater jump height
#1
long-duration percussive massage treatment (L-PMT)
increase
peak ground reaction force during the countermovement jump propulsion phase
physically active young men
p < 0.001, d = 19.174 compared to SS; p < 0.001, d = 14.334 compared to S-PMT
demonstrated significantly greater peak ground reaction force
#2
long-duration percussive massage treatment (L-PMT)
increase
propulsion impulse during the countermovement jump propulsion phase
physically active young men
p < 0.001, d = 8.302 compared to SS; p = 0.003, d = 4.517 compared to S-PMT
demonstrated significantly greater propulsion impulse
#3
long-duration percussive massage treatment (L-PMT)
decrease
normalized integrated electromyography of the vastus medialis muscle
physically active young men
p < 0.001, d = -5.692 compared to S-PMT; p < 0.001, d = -12 compared to SS
were significantly lower
#4
long-duration percussive massage treatment (L-PMT)
decrease
normalized integrated electromyography of the rectus femoris muscle
physically active young men
p < 0.001, d = -8.222 compared to S-PMT; p < 0.001, d = -11.384 compared to SS
were significantly lower
#5
long-duration percussive massage treatment (L-PMT)
decrease
normalized integrated electromyography of the vastus lateralis muscle
physically active young men
p < 0.001, d = -10 compared to S-PMT; p < 0.001, d = -15 compared to SS
were significantly lower
#6
long-duration percussive massage treatment (L-PMT)
decrease
visual analog scale pain score
physically active young men
p = 0.003, d = -1.53 compared to SS
exhibited significantly lower VAS scores
#7
long-duration percussive massage treatment (L-PMT)
increase
knee joint range of motion
physically active young men
p = 0.012, d = 4.77 compared to SS
exhibited significantly greater knee joint ROM
#8
percussive massage treatment (PMT)
increase
delayed onset muscle soreness recovery
physically active young men
-
was more effective than static stretching
#9
two 40-min PMT sessions
increase
delayed onset muscle soreness treatment
physically active young men
-
provided greater benefits than two 25-min sessions
#10
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Delayed onset muscle soreness (DOMS) is a common condition among physically active individuals, often resulting in reduced performance and discomfort. Although percussive massage treatment (PMT) is widely used as a recovery tool, there is limited evidence supporting its efficacy compared to traditional methods such as static stretching. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of PMT on recovery from DOMS in physically active young men. METHODS: Thirty physically active male college students were randomized into three groups: static stretching (SS) group, a short-duration PMT (S-PMT) group, and a long-duration PMT (L-PMT) group. All participants performed squats to induce DOMS, followed by interventions of static stretching, 25 min of PMT, or 40 min of PMT, respectively. Measurements included the visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, knee joint range of motion (ROM), countermovement jump (CMJ), and integrated electromyography (iEMG). These were measured at baseline (P0), post-DOMS protocol (P1), post PMT (P2), 24 h post-intervention (P3), and 48 h post-intervention (P4). Data were analyzed using repeated-measures ANOVA or nonparametric tests, with multiple comparisons conducted at a significance level of p < 0.05. RESULTS: Compared with the SS and S-PMT group, the L-PMT group at P4 demonstrated significantly greater jump height (SS group: p < 0.001, d = 8.691; S-PMT group: p = 0.006, d = 4.37), peak ground reaction force (SS group: p < 0.001, d = 19.174; S-PMT group: p < 0.001, d = 14.334), and propulsion impulse (SS group: p < 0.001, d = 8.302; S-PMT group: p = 0.003, d = 4.517) during the CMJ propulsion phase. Additionally, the normalized iEMGs of the three muscles in the L-PMT group were significantly lower than those in the S-PMT (VM: p < 0.001, d = -5.692; RF: p < 0.001, d = -8.222; VL: p < 0.001, d = -10) and SS groups at P4 (VM: p < 0.001, d = -12; RF: p < 0.001, d = -11.384; VL: p < 0.001, d = -15). At P4, the L-PMT group exhibited significantly lower VAS scores than the SS group (p = 0.003, d = -1.53), as well as significantly greater knee joint ROM compared to the SS group (p = 0.012,d = 4.77). CONCLUSION: PMT was more effective than static stretching for DOMS recovery. Furthermore, two 40-min PMT sessions provided greater benefits than two 25-min sessions for treating DOMS. These findings suggest that PMT can be a valuable tool for physically active individuals seeking to enhance recovery and maintain performance. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov on September 21, 2024, with the identifier number NCT06612502.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
AdultHumansMaleYoung AdultElectromyographyMassageMyalgiaPain MeasurementPercussionRange of Motion, Articular
Study Links
Quality Scores
SafetyNot Assessed
Efficacy80/10
Quality80/10
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.05
Weight Score2.60
Normalized Score0.68
Related Supplements