Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Effect of Mindfulness-Based Intervention on Psychological Outcomes in Surgeons: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

World journal of surgery
May 1, 2025
Shahab Hajibandeh et al. (7 authors)
Journal ArticleReviewHuman Study
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to evaluate the effect of mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) on psychological outcomes, specifically stress, mindfulness, burnout, and anxiety, in surgeons.

Results Summary

MBIs significantly reduced stress, improved mindfulness, and decreased burnout (including depersonalization and emotional exhaustion) but did not significantly affect depression or anxiety. The study had moderate to high certainty for these outcomes but noted the need for further research on long-term surgical performance and patient outcomes.

Population

179 surgical residents (98 in MBI group, 81 in control group) from five studies (4 RCTs, 1 cohort study).

Effective Dosage

Not specified

Duration

Not specified

Interactions

None mentioned

Extracted Claims (7)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs)
decrease
stress (Perceived Stress Scale, PSS-10)
surgical residents
MD: -3.24, 95% CI -6.10 to -0.39, and p = 0.030
reduced
#1
mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs)
increase
mindfulness (Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale-Revised, CAMS-R)
surgical residents
MD: 3.97, 95% CI 2.57-5.37, and p < 0.00001
improved
#2
mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs)
decrease
burnout (abbreviated Maslach Burnout Inventory [aMBI])
surgical residents
MD: -1.98, 95% CI -3.57 to -0.38, and p = 0.020
reduced
#3
mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs)
decrease
depersonalization
surgical residents
MD: -2.80, 95% CI -5.22 to -0.38, and p = 0.020
reduced
#4
mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs)
decrease
emotional exhaustion
surgical residents
MD: -3.20, 95% CI -5.48 to -0.92, and p = 0.0006
reduced
#5
mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs)
no change
depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-2 [PHQ-2])
surgical residents
MD: -0.46, 95% CI -1.32 to -0.40, and p = 0.290
did not influence
#6
mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs)
no change
anxiety (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory [STAI])
surgical residents
MD: -0.16, 95% CI -2.62 to -2.30, and p = 0.900
did not influence
#7
Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) on psychological outcomes in surgeons. METHODS: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis (random effects modeling) was performed searching for comparative studies. Primary outcomes were stress (Perceived Stress Scale, PSS-10) and mindfulness (Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale-Revised, CAMS-R). Secondary outcomes were burnout and anxiety (abbreviated Maslach Burnout Inventory [aMBI], Patient Health Questionnaire-2 [PHQ-2], and State-Trait Anxiety Inventory [STAI]). RESULTS: Surgical residents numbering 179 (MBIs 98 vs. control 81) from five studies (4 RCTs and 1 cohort study) were included. At baseline, both cohorts were comparable in terms of stress (PSS-10, p = 0.420), mindfulness (CAMS-R, p = 0.620), burnout (aMBI, p = 0.980), depersonalization (p = 740), emotional exhaustion (p = 480), depression (PHQ-2, p = 0.280), and anxiety (STAI, p = 0.060). MBIs reduced stress (PSS-10; MD: -3.24, 95% CI -6.10 to -0.39, and p = 0.030), improved mindfulness (CAMS-R; MD: 3.97, 95% CI 2.57-5.37, and p < 0.00001), and reduced burnout (aMBI; MD: -1.98, 95% CI -3.57 to -0.38, and p = 0.020), depersonalization (MD: -2.80, 95% CI -5.22 to -0.38, and p = 0.020), and emotional exhaustion (MD: -3.20, 95% CI -5.48 to -0.92, and p = 0.0006). MBIs did not influence depression (PHQ-2; MD: -0.46, 95% CI -1.32 to -0.40, and p = 0.290) or anxiety (STAI; MD: -0.16, 95% CI -2.62 to -2.30, and p = 0.900). CONCLUSIONS: MBIs may improve psychological outcomes as shown by better mindfulness (high certainly), less stress (moderate certainty), and burnout (moderate certainty). Whether MBIs translate into better long-term surgical performance and patient outcomes should be the focus of future research. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration number: CRD42024595967.

Study Links
Quality Scores
SafetyNot Assessed
Efficacy80/10
Quality80/10
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.05
Weight Score2.60
Normalized Score0.68
Related Supplements