Long-term effects of participation in a randomized trial of a low-fat, high-carbohydrate diet.
Study Goal
The researchers aimed to examine the long-term effects of a low-fat, high-carbohydrate diet on nutrient intake and other variables in women with extensive mammographic densities.
Results Summary
The intervention group showed significantly lower fat intake and cholesterol levels, with some hormonal changes, but no difference in estradiol levels. The study also confirmed that women with extensive mammographic densities are at higher risk for breast cancer.
Population
Women with extensive mammographic densities.
Effective Dosage
Not specified
Duration
Several years (follow-up after active participation ended)
Interactions
None mentioned
| Intervention | Direction | Endpoint | Population | Dosage | Impact | Claim # |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
dietary intervention with a low-fat, high-carbohydrate diet | decrease | Total energy intake | women with extensive mammographic densities | slightly lower | was slightly lower | #1 |
dietary intervention with a low-fat, high-carbohydrate diet | decrease | Total fat and percent energy from fat | women with extensive mammographic densities | significantly lower | were significantly lower | #2 |
dietary intervention with a low-fat, high-carbohydrate diet | decrease | intake of all types of fat (saturated fat, linoleic acid, and oleic acid) and dietary cholesterol | women with extensive mammographic densities | lower | was lower | #3 |
dietary intervention with a low-fat, high-carbohydrate diet | no change | polyunsaturated/saturated fat ratio | women with extensive mammographic densities | no significant change | did not differ | #4 |
dietary intervention with a low-fat, high-carbohydrate diet | decrease | Total cholesterol and apoprotein B levels | women with extensive mammographic densities | lower | were lower | #5 |
dietary intervention with a low-fat, high-carbohydrate diet | increase | Follicle-stimulating hormone | postmenopausal members of the intervention group | 29% | was 29% higher | #6 |
dietary intervention with a low-fat, high-carbohydrate diet | no change | levels of estradiol | postmenopausal members of the intervention group | no significant change | was no difference | #7 |
selection of women with extensive mammographic densities | increase | a high-risk group | women enrolled in pilot studies | 5.7 times the number expected | does identify | #8 |
In 1982 we started a series of pilot studies to examine the feasibility of dietary intervention with a low-fat, high-carbohydrate diet in women with extensive mammographic densities. The purpose of the present paper is to examine the long-term effects of participation in these studies by assessing nutrient intake and other variables several years after active participation had stopped. Two hundred sixteen women were eligible for the follow-up study and were invited to attend and interview with a dietician. Data were collected by food frequency questionnaire from 157 subjects (73%), and blood was obtained from 115 subjects. Total energy intake was slightly lower in the intervention group. Total fat and percent energy from fat were significantly lower in the intervention group. The intake of all types of fat (saturated fat, linoleic acid, and oleic acid) and dietary cholesterol was lower in the in the intervention group; however, the polyunsaturated/saturated fat ratio did not differ between the groups. Total cholesterol and apoprotein B levels were lower in the intervention group compared to the control group. Follicle-stimulating hormone was 29% higher in postmenopausal members of the intervention group than in controls, but there was no difference in levels of estradiol. A total of 19 women enrolled in pilot studies had developed breast cancer, 5.7 times the number expected, confirming that the selection of women with extensive mammographic densities does identify a high-risk group. These data suggest that even quite short periods of intensive dietary counselling may have prolonged effects on diet, and that once subjects have adopted new dietary habits, the habits may persist even in the absence of continued counselling.